Skip to Content News Archives Economy Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials HomeNewsEconomyCharles St-Arnaud: Recession or not, Canada's economy doesn't look goodCanada is navigating a difficult environment, whether it's trade uncertainty, energy costs or adapting to the new world order You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Canada is not in a recession, at least not yet, and not by any rigorous definition, but the conditions that could tip it into a genuine downturn are present. Photo by Devonyu/Getty ImagesCanada’s gross domestic product data for the first quarter of 2026 set off a predictable wave of alarm bells as the economy contracted for the second consecutive quarter. Many are asking whether Canada has officially entered a recession. It’s a reasonable question, but the wrong one. Before we can answer it, we need to define and agree on what a recession actually is.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorMost people have heard the simple rule: two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth equals a recession. It’s clean, simple and widely cited. It is also incomplete and overly simplistic.Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againEconomists view this as the technical definition precisely because it relies on a mechanical rule rather than any substantive analysis of what is actually happening in the economy. It has correctly identified every official Canadian recession since 1960, but it has also thrown up two false positives in 1980 and 2015 and could also lead to a false positive in 2026.The reason the rule misfires is that context matters enormously. Is an economic contraction caused by a surge in imports — driven by strong domestic demand — as alarming as one caused by consumers pulling back their spending? Of course not. The headline number can look identical while the underlying reality is completely different.Similarly, if only one narrow sector of the economy is responsible for the contraction, can it reliably be considered a recession?In the current case, the contraction in the final quarter of 2025 was primarily driven by a reduction in inventories, mainly due to a rise in exports. The contraction in early 2026 is largely attributable to a spike in imports, particularly gold. Neither story is especially alarming. Moreover, the size of the latest contraction, 0.1 per cent, is quite marginal.The C.D. Howe Business Cycle Council, the de facto authority on recession in Canada, applies a much more rigorous standard. It defines a recession as a “pronounced, persistent and pervasive decline in real economic activity” lasting at least two consecutive quarters and, crucially, one that is broad in nature, affecting more than a small number of industries.By that measure, the current episode falls somewhat short. Economic activity is only about 0.3 per cent below its recent peak in the second quarter of 2025. By comparison, there was a decline of 4.4 per cent during the 2008–2009 recession. Hence, we are far from a pronounced decline in activity.What we are experiencing today looks far more like stalled growth than an outright contraction. The weakness is also concentrated in trade-exposed sectors rather than spread across the broader economy, which is precisely what you’d expect given the ongoing disruptions to international trade and supply chains.So, no, Canada is likely not technically in a recession, but that doesn’t mean the Canadian economy isn’t going through a rough patch.Canada has lost more than 110,000 jobs since the start of the year, according to the April Labour Force Survey. That is not a number to dismiss.What has often been overlooked is the role population growth, mainly resulting from changes to immigration policies, has played in the economic cycle. In recent years, an exceptionally rapid expansion of the population provided an artificial floor under Canada’s economic performance.Now, as federal immigration policy tightens and population growth slows, that support is being withdrawn and the economic growth is weakening accordingly.The rule of thumb here is straightforward: a one-percentage-point decline in population growth reduces potential GDP growth by roughly the same amount, all else being equal. With an aging workforce reducing labour input and productivity growth stubbornly weak, Canada’s potential growth rate in early 2026 is dangerously close to zero.That matters because it leaves virtually no margin for error. Any further underperformance relative to potential leads to an economic contraction.Here is a telling counterfactual: We estimate that without the population surge, Canada would have been in a recession in the second half of 2023. During that same period, GDP per capita was declining, a clear signal of deteriorating living standards, even as the aggregate numbers held up and individual households were reducing their spending.In the current episode, adjusting for pre-pandemic population growth trends, the past two quarters would likely have shown positive growth, with the latest quarter showing a modest improvement in GDP per capita, which is at least one encouraging sign.Canada is not in a recession, at least not yet, and not by any rigorous definition. But the Canadian economy is struggling, and the conditions that could tip it into a genuine downturn are present.What is missing is further weakness in household spending and disposable income, as there has never been a recession in Canada without a decline in household spending and income.Whether the current weakness deepens or stabilizes remains genuinely uncertain. But some comfort can be taken in the preliminary estimate for April, which suggests a rebound in economic activity.Recession or not, what is clear is that Canada is navigating a more difficult environment than it has faced in years, whether it is United States trade policy uncertainty, higher energy costs or adapting to the new world order. That will warrant continued attention, regardless of the label we assign to it.Charles St-Arnaud is chief economist at Servus Credit Union. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.