Type to search articles, cases, and authors.

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court determined that people have a reasonable right to privacy on their devices. The government had argued “geofence warrants” don’t constitute…

Type to search articles, cases, and authors.

The Supreme Court's decision to limit geofence warrants is a win for privacy advocates, who called their use unconstitutional but sought an outright ban.

Kagan said location data resembles other private materials such as emails, photographs or documents.

The Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants are Fourth Amendment searches and revived a Virginia man’s challenge to cellphone location evidence.

The court stopped short of declaring geofence warrants unconstitutional.

The high court on Monday ruled that the use of a “geofence warrant” to capture location data from cell phones in search of a robbery suspect constituted a search for Fourth…

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that police looking to obtain sweeping data on cellphone users near a crime scene must have a warrant.

Supreme Court rules constitutional privacy protections apply to geofence warrants - SiliconANGLE

The Supreme Court ruled geofence warrants need probable cause, finding people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone location data.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Chatrie v. United States, the first direct constitutional challenge to geofence warrants.

The Supreme Court’s Chatrie ruling limits geofence warrants but dodges the bigger threat: the outdated third-party doctrine exposing your data.