The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Chatrie v. United States, the first direct constitutional challenge to geofence warrants.

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court determined that people have a reasonable right to privacy on their devices. The government had argued “geofence warrants” don’t constitute…

Type to search articles, cases, and authors.

The Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants are Fourth Amendment searches and revived a Virginia man’s challenge to cellphone location evidence.

The court stopped short of declaring geofence warrants unconstitutional.

The divided Supreme Court ruled that Americans are entitled to privacy protections even if they consent to tech companies tracking their location.

Supreme Court rules constitutional privacy protections apply to geofence warrants - SiliconANGLE

The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Chatrie v. United States, the first direct constitutional challenge to geofence warrants.

The Supreme Court’s Chatrie ruling limits geofence warrants but dodges the bigger threat: the outdated third-party doctrine exposing your data.