Google no longer collects this information in a way that is susceptible to geofence warrants, and, more importantly, Apple never did.
Amy Howe, writing at the ever-excellent SCOTUSblog:
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that when law enforcement
officials used a “geofence warrant” — a warrant that instructed
Google to provide location data for cellphone users who were near
a particular place during a specific time period — to obtain
Type to search articles, cases, and authors.
The court stopped short of declaring geofence warrants unconstitutional.
Supreme Court rules constitutional privacy protections apply to geofence warrants - SiliconANGLE
The high court on Monday ruled that the use of a “geofence warrant” to capture location data from cell phones in search of a…
The Supreme Court’s Chatrie ruling limits geofence warrants but dodges the bigger threat: the outdated third-party doctrine…
The Supreme Court ruled geofence warrants need probable cause, finding people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their…
