Skip to Content Subscribe My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Modern Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Modern Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentJeffrey Herf: 'Nakba' exhibit is a direct assault on historical truthsHistorian Jeffrey Herf visits the human rights museum and details what was left out of the controversial exhibitLast updated 1 hour ago The "Palestine Uprooted" exhibit at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg. Photo by Adam Katz/Postmedia FilesThe “Palestine Uprooted: Nakba Past and Present” exhibit at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights” (CMHR) brings the propaganda of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) of the 1970s into an institution that receives substantial funding from federal, provincial and municipal governments.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThe Network of Engaged Canadian Academics invited me to Winnipeg to view the exhibit, drawing on my expertise as a historian who, in works including “Israel’s Moment” and “Three Faces of Antisemitism,” has studied the establishment of the State of Israel, the impact of Nazism and communism on antagonism towards Zionism and Israel both before and after 1948, along with hostility toward the Jewish state in both secular leftist and Islamist circles.“Palestine Uprooted” repeats a version of events articulated by the PLO member and writer Mahmoud Darwish in a speech he wrote that was delivered by PLO chair Yasser Arafat to the United Nations General Assembly in 1974. According to Darwish and Arafat, Palestinian innocence and Israeli perfidy justified decades of PLO terrorism and rejection of compromise.The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThe current exhibit repeats the same version of events they offered 52 years ago. The only new element is that what originated as part of a propaganda campaign to delegitimate the State of Israel and justify the use terror to destroy it is now receiving credibility and legitimacy from a government-affiliated museum in Canada.The exhibit claims that, “Around 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced during the creation of the State of Israel.” This is not true. Historians such as Efraim Karsh in his book “Palestine Betrayed” and Yoav Gelber in “Palestine 1948: War, Escape and the Emergence of the Palestinian Problem” have demonstrated that many thousands left their homes, some at the urging of Arab leaders, in expectation that the Arab states would soon invade and destroy the new Jewish state.As the historian Benny Morris documented in “1948: The First Arab-Israeli War,” thousands of others became refugees as a result of battles in particular towns and villages — battles that Israel had to fight and win to ensure its survival.The exhibit fails to inform viewers that in November 1947, Canada joined a two-thirds majority at the UN supporting a resolution that called for the establishment of two states — one Jewish, and one Arab — in parts of the former British Mandate for Palestine.The Palestinian Arabs, represented at the UN by the Arab Higher Committee, rejected the partition plan, insisting that there should be no Jewish state in the territory whatsoever. The Jewish community in Mandate Palestine, represented at the UN by the Jewish Agency, accepted what became known as “the two-state solution.”The votes in favour of the resolution came from the Soviet Union, the communist regimes of Eastern Europe, the democracies of Western Europe, the United States and Canada, among others. On Dec. 2, 1947, Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, leader of the Arab Higher Committee, responded to the UN resolution by calling for a general strike to reject it, and in the following months, the committee launched a civil war against the Jewish community to prevent its implementation.The exhibit says nothing about Husseini’s then-famous Islamist Jew-hatred, a hatred that stimulated his enthusiastic wartime collaboration with Nazi Germany, and led to his opposition to the Zionist project. The exhibit also fails to mention that on May 15, 1948, in a joint act of aggression, five Arab states — Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria — then escalated that war by ordering their armies to destroy the newly formed Jewish state.In keeping with its propagandistic essence, the exhibit erases any agency or responsibility on the part of Palestinian Arab leaders or Arab states for beginning and escalating a war to prevent the creation of — and, upon failing that, destroy — the State of Israel.It was the Arab rejection of the UN resolution, not the Zionist defence of the compromise, that was unjust, unwise and, yes, racist, as well. At its core, it was a rejection of the values of diversity and tolerance that the Canadian Museum for Human Rights claims to support. Had the Arab Higher Committee accepted the compromise offered by the UN in 1947, there would have been no war of 1948, and no Arabs or Jews would have been uprooted.The ability of Palestinian propagandists to capture and misuse the credibility of a government-affiliated institution in Winnipeg will not only fan the flames of anti-Zionism and antisemitism in Canada. By ignoring well-known works of historical scholarship, it also constitutes an attack on the discipline of history and the effort of historians to present a truthful and complete account of the past.Historians in Canada should defend our profession against the CMHR’s dismissal of our valid, but for some inconvenient, findings. Government officials should ensure that the credibility that comes from government funding is not extended to the kinds of distortions of the past that are evident in this exhibit.National PostJeffrey Herf is professor emeritus at the University of Maryland and author of “Israel’s Moment: International Support for and Opposition to Establishing the Jewish State, 1945-1949.” Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.