Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentRob Breakenridge: Canadians would be better off without supply managementUnfortunately, Trump has not left Canadians in a mood for further compromisesLast updated 13 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.The U.S. and Canada flags flutter next to the Blue Water Bridge border crossing in Point Edward, Ontario, on October 24, 2025. Photo by GEOFF ROBINS /AFP via Getty ImagesIt’s curious that Donald Trump would be so fixated on Canadian trade practices if he, as he stated this week, doesn’t care about updating the current trade agreement and that he’d “rather be independent.”Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorIt’s also interesting that the U.S. president is so bothered by Canada’s dairy protectionism, when he himself is such a defender of tariffs as smart and sound economic policy. The U.S. certainly maintains all sorts of agricultural protectionism policies, notably the tariffs and cartel system that protect the U.S. sugar industry.Regardless, though, new tariffs are looming. We can analyze the president’s internal contradictions or try to parse his true motivations, but none of that changes the reality of this further erosion of the Canada-U.S. trading relationship.The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againMind you, this isn’t the first trading partner we’ve alienated or the first trade deal we’ve imperiled over supply management. In this case, the U.S. has a valid complaint over not just the broad protectionist aspects of our system, but also differences in how Canada treats American and European dairy imports.Unfortunately, Trump’s obstinance, hypocrisy and belligerence have not left Canadians in a mood for further compromises. Weakness just seems to further embolden him, anyway. So it’s less likely now that we’ll budge on supply management.Which is too bad, because at the end of the day, Canadians would be better off without it.Supply management is one of three examples of trade “discrimination” that Trump has cited in order to justify new 50 per cent tariffs on a variety of Canadian goods.Under our system, the number of producers and the amount of production is set through quotas, while prices are set by marketing boards. All of this is shielded by massive tariffs (upwards of 300 per cent, in some cases) meant to keep imports out.Under both the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) and the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), small amounts of foreign dairy products are allowed into Canada either tariff-free or at reduced tariff rates.The difference in the two agreements concerns how those products come into Canada in the first place. Under our trade agreement with the U.S., it’s Canadian dairy processors and distributors who hold the import licences. Conversely, under CETA, it’s Canadian retailers who hold those licences and can import directly from European producers.There’s much more incentive for retailers to maximize those import allotments, as opposed to those in the dairy industry, which is why the U.S. has cried foul over this discrepancy. And it’s not just Trump, by the way — under the Biden administration, two complaints were filed over this.In fairness to Canada, this doesn’t technically violate CUSMA. If the Americans want provisions similar to those contained within CETA, that would be something for the negotiating table – assuming there’s a desire to be at the table.With the U.S. instead opting for escalation, there’s a hardening on the Canadian side. Political leaders have vowed to protect supply management, and Canadians are increasingly on board.A new Angus Reid poll found that 42 per cent of Canadians would prefer the government stand firm on supply management, with just 28 per cent support for using it as a bargaining chip and only 16 per cent calling for an end to the policy.For all the talk about protecting Canadian producers and jobs, however, we’re very narrowly focused on one small part of the broader agricultural sector.The rest of the industry, on the other hand, is very much threatened by tariffs on Canadian exports and backward steps on open and free trade. The proposed new U.S. tariffs on Canadian dairy products are essentially a moot point, since our dairy industry is not really interested in exports. It’s a different story elsewhere, though.Beef producers, for example, export billions of dollars worth of product to the U.S. each year. The world’s largest two-way trade in beef and live cattle involves our two countries.Or, take lentils as another example. In recent years, Canada has become a world leader in lentil exports with more than 90 per cent of what’s produced here being exported abroad.It’s easy to see how damaging it would be to lose that market access. We saw already how devastating it was when China slapped tariffs on Canadian canola exports. None of these other agriculture sectors needs or wants supply management-style cartel systems.But there’s also the matter of how all of this impacts Canadian consumers. At a time when food inflation and food insecurity have become pressing concerns, it’s all the more perplexing for us to cling to a policy that — by design — keeps dairy, egg and poultry prices inflated.A recent analysis from the Montreal Economic Institute confirms what previous studies have concluded: supply management harms Canadian consumers. This latest report pegs the cost to the average Canadian at $244 annually.There could potentially be some cracks forming in the Canadian political consensus around our status quo. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney this week called on conservatives to end “slavish devotion to the supply management cartel,” arguing that it “violates our free market principles, inflates food prices for struggling families, and undermines our global trade interests.”It’s still an uphill battle, though, especially with the Trump factor. There is likely value in removing the excuses and pretences Trump can use to justify his tariffs, but there’s little appetite at the moment for giving him a win.However, ending supply management doesn’t have to mean capitulation to the Americans. If we’re concerned about how the U.S. heavily subsidizes agriculture producers, we can treat that as dumping (as the U.S. does with Canadian softwood lumber).If we’re concerned about food safety and certain U.S. agricultural practices, we can maintain specific safety standards for any products entering Canada. That doesn’t require all of the other baggage of supply management.Even though he doesn’t seem genuinely interested in free trade, Trump has a point about supply management. His clumsy intervention has regrettably made it a bigger challenge to finally reform this system, but changes are long overdue.National PostRob Breakenridge is a Calgary-based podcaster and writer. He can be found at robbreakenridge.ca and reached at rob.breakenridge@gmail.com Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.