The plaintiff claimed that she refused to adopt her employer’s views because she viewed them as racist and discriminatory against White people.
An article from
Dive Brief
The plaintiff claimed that she refused to adopt her employer’s views because she viewed them as racist and discriminatory against White people.
Published July 13, 2026
Pedestrians pass by the Everett McKinley Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, location of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, on July 22, 2010, in Chicago, Ill. The court partly sided with a Wisconsin plaintiff alleging discrimination and violations of the First Amendment.
The court’s analysis involved determining whether the Chicago Transit Authority’s request for a third opinion on his leave…
The U.S. Supreme Court has said that federal job discrimination claims are not barred by certain state agencies’ administrative…
An attorney for the plaintiff told HR Dive his team will consider filing a petition for review with the U.S. Supreme Court.
With DEI already under threat, employers are bracing for a wave of reverse discrimination claims from "majority" groups such as…
A Black former BNY employee failed to show that his placement on a performance improvement plan was the result of race-based…
The 5th Circuit rejected a plaintiff’s argument that the high court effectively eliminated his need to show he was treated less…
