Skip to Content News Archives Economy Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials HomeFP CommentOpinion: Carney should be the anti-Trump and jettison Brookfield from his portfolioContinuing connections that require the prime minister to skip policy meetings create a perceived conflict of interestLast updated Jul 10, 2026 You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.The only real solution is for Mark Carney to cash out and sever all financial ties with Brookfield. Anything less just doesn’t cut it. Photo by HYUNGCHEOL PARK/PostmediaSince he entered politics, Prime Minister Mark Carney has been accused of actual or perceived conflicts of interests, mainly regarding his connection to Brookfield Corporation. Before running for leader of the Liberal party in 2025, Carney was, first, vice-chair and head of ESG and impact investing and, later, board chair at Brookfield Asset Management. As such, he received shares, options and performance pay as part of his compensation package.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorNow, as prime minister, he is making decisions that will impact these assets to the tune of, potentially, tens of millions of dollars. Brookfield’s investments are related to several key areas of public policy — including energy, environment, industry, taxation and infrastructure — in all of which Carney’s portfolio may put him in a conflict of interest.Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againWhat exactly is a conflict of interest? According to the Department of Justice, “A public office holder is in a conflict of interest when he or she exercises an official power, duty or function that provides an opportunity to further his or her private interests or those of his or her relatives or friends or to improperly further another person’s private interests.”Having a real or even perceived conflict of interest over one’s head reduces a leader’s effectiveness whether in government or corporate life. If the head of a country’s government is thought to be serving his needs rather than those of his country and its citizens, such corruption is a clear threat to democracy — as is becoming all too clear in the United States during the second Trump administration. For a public corporation, reputation is a critical intangible asset to be fiercely protected. To quote Brookfield’s own Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, “Our reputation is everything and we should act responsibly in dealings with our securityholders, customers, clients, investors, suppliers, other stakeholders and competitors.”As executive director of InvestNow and a shareholder of Brookfield Corporation, I submitted a shareholder proposal regarding the real and worrisome issue of the prime minister’s conflict of interest. Although Brookfield dismissed the proposal and will not be including it in its annual general meeting materials, we will be asking about Carney’s actual or perceived conflict of interest at the AGM on July 16. We want to help keep public attention on the issue and prevent normalization of the prime minister’s conflicts — or anyone else’s for that matter.All countries must deal with conflicts of interest in the political and corporate spheres. Many have set up systems or groups to manage them. Canada and the United States both have ethics watchdogs. In Canada the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner helps “elected and appointed federal officials avoid conflicts between public and private interests.”Concerns over President Trump’s business activities have heightened recently with the release of mandatory financial disclosures revealing his 2025 income was $2.2 billion. Trump’s apparently successful alignment of policy with profit has many Americans asking whether he is working for the country or for himself and his family.Some argue existing mechanisms safeguard the public interest against conflicts of interest and they cite, for example, the ethics screen, a recusal process and the fact Carney’s assets have been placed in a blind trust. But the ethics screen is run by two non-elected Carney appointees. The recusal process has led to Carney being a “no-show” on 17 deliberations because of his Brookfield ties. And the blind trust can never truly be blind. There is as a result still room for reasonable concerns about conflicts of interest.The only real solution is for Carney to cash out and sever all financial ties with Brookfield. Anything less just doesn’t cut it.Carney apologists — brave ones — might point to Donald Trump’s many alleged conflicts of interest, whether his hotel business, his crypto investments, his relationship with the UAE and Qatar, or others But Canadians want to hold their government to a higher bar than the Trump standard. They need to know their leaders will govern in pursuit of the national interest, not their personal gain. They also need to know that corporate Canada is operating under strict governance rules and standards. Once assured of this, they will be in a better position to hold to account everyone in power, whether in governments or corporations.Gina Pappano is executive director of InvestNow. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Opinion: Carney should be the anti-Trump and jettison Brookfield from his portfolio
Continuing connections that require the prime minister to skip policy meetings create a perceived conflict of interest. Find out more here










