Story audio is generated using AI
Every parent reaches a moment when they realise their children no longer need to be taught who they are. They begin revealing who they are becoming.I had one of those moments recently. My 17-year-old twin daughters surprised their older brothers with paintings they had created for milestone birthdays. The artwork was beautiful, but it was the thought behind it that stayed with me. Watching them express such confidence, empathy and imagination, I realised I was witnessing something every parent hopes for: not talent, but character taking shape.As I reflected on that moment, I found myself thinking about another question altogether: what kind of future are we creating for the next generation?”As both a mother and the group CEO of Zeda Limited, a JSE-listed integrated mobility solutions company, I have come to realise that these two questions are not as different as they first appear.Both are ultimately questions about opportunity, and opportunity, more often than we acknowledge, is shaped by where capital flows and how that capital fuels socioeconomic impact.This August marks 70 years since thousands of South African women marched to the Union Buildings.We often remember that day, quite rightly, for its courage, but I sometimes wonder whether courage was only part of what happened.The march was also one of the most remarkable acts of collective organisation in our history. Those women had little access to the forms of capital we instinctively associate with power today. They did not control investment portfolios, they did not sit on corporate boards, and they also did not determine fiscal policy or influence the allocation of financial resources.Yet they shaped history by how they organised their collective convictions and the resources available to them. In their instance, the capital they possessed was not financial, but it was collective courage, their relationship, as well as their willingness to stand together in pursuit of a future they would never fully see.In the absence of financial capital, they allocated themselves, and in doing so, they fundamentally altered the direction of our country.As I watch my daughters prepare to step into adulthood, I realise they are living inside possibilities that another generation first had the courage to imagine. That is an extraordinary inheritance. We can, however, argue that every inheritance carries with it a new responsibility.For many years, we have measured progress by counting the number of women who have entered spaces once closed to them. We have celebrated the first women to lead companies, chair boards, run institutions and shape public life. Those milestones matter because they expand our collective imagination of what is possible, but I do sometimes wonder if we have mistaken the doorway for the destination.My daughters belong to a generation that has never seriously questioned whether a woman can become a chief executive. To them, that possibility already exists. Their generation will not be defined simply by whether women can enter the room. It will be defined by what they choose to build once they are inside. I believe this requires us to broaden our understanding of leadership.Early in my career, I was presented with opportunities that promised greater financial reward and different career paths. While the roles I accepted would eventually take me across both the public and private sectors, one principle remained constant: I wanted to serve.Looking back, I realise I did not yet fully understand what I meant.Service was never an abstract ideal. I came to understand it through difficult decisions, where I had to balance competing priorities, make the best use of limited resources and take responsibility for the outcomes.That lesson has followed me into every leadership role I have held since, and the ongoing question I have allowed myself to ask in every version of my career is: what future are we trying to build?It sounds deceptively simple, but it is the question behind every investment decision, every acquisition, an expansion into a new market or even a decision to wait.I truly believe leadership is about making responsible decisions with the resources entrusted to you. Long before capital appears on a balance sheet, it exists as a decision.One of the privileges of leading a listed company is participating in conversations where those decisions carry real consequences.Perhaps this is why I think differently about success today than I did at the beginning of my career. Back then, success felt like something to pursue. Today, it feels like something to pass on.We often speak about capital as though it were simply money — it isn’t. Capital is possibility.It determines which entrepreneur receives a first opportunity, which innovation reaches the market, which communities attract investment and which ideas are given room to mature. Every allocation of capital is, in effect, a decision about whose future we are prepared to back.Nowhere is this more evident than in Africa. The African Development Bank estimates that women entrepreneurs across the continent face a financing gap of almost $49bn (about R800bn). That figure is often presented as a problem of finance. I have come to see an additional layer — it is also a measure of unrealised possibility.For South Africa, every rand withheld from a viable business is not just capital denied but is a job not created in a country that is facing critical levels of unemployment. Down the value chain it is a supplier not contracted, innovation not commercialised, or a young woman who never sees what becomes possible when an idea is given the opportunity to grow. We already know that African women are increasingly building businesses, creating employment and driving innovation. The question is no longer whether women have the capability to lead. It is whether our economies are prepared to invest in that capability at the scale required.This is why I believe the next frontier of women’s leadership is not simply representation but stewardship.I believe the most consequential decisions in any economy are made when capital is allocated in ways that unlock economic value chains across sectors. Every allocation of capital is, ultimately, a decision about the future we choose to build.Around the world, we have repeatedly seen what happens when women gain greater influence over capital. Research by the International Finance Corporation has consistently shown that women-owned businesses remain significantly underfinanced despite demonstrating strong commercial potential. Closing that financing gap is estimated to unlock substantial economic growth, job creation and innovation across emerging markets.We see a similar pattern in agriculture, where studies by the Food and Agriculture Organisation have found that if women had the same access to productive resources as men, agricultural output in developing countries could rise by up to 4%, reducing the number of undernourished people by as many as 150 million. The issue was never capability. It was access.Even in boardrooms, the conversation is evolving. Increasingly, the question is no longer simply whether women occupy seats at the table but whether they influence the investment decisions, capital allocation and strategic priorities that shape organisations long after meetings have ended.Ganda is CEO of Zeda Limited
