The Jellyfish Nebula has been hiding a big cosmic secretFor the first time ever, astronomers have found two sibling stars that each exploded as supernovas, gaining a new view of these epochal cosmic cataclysmsBy Damien Pine edited by Lee BillingsA composite false-color view of the Jellyfish Nebula and its surroundings in several different types of light, showing structures that reveal the presence of not one but two supernova remnants. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and M. Michailidis et al. 2026; orange, brown: radio, ESA/ Planck and MWISP; yellow: optical, DSS; red: infrared, NASA/ WISE; violet: ultraviolet, NASA/ Swift; teal: X-rays, SRG/eROSITAFor decades, astrophysicists have been puzzling over a mystery hidden in plain view: Most supernovas come from the biggest stars, and most of our galaxy’s biggest stars are thought to be in multi-star systems, yet no one has ever found two supernovas occurring in a single multi-star system.Until now, that is.This newly discovered system is made up of one of the most-studied supernova remnants in our galaxy, IC 443 (the Jellyfish Nebula), and a second, fainter remnant hiding nearby, called G189.6+3.3. IC 443 shines so brightly that it masks this second remnant, which only proved detectable via reams of old data and fresh observations from new, exquisitely sensitive space telescopes.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Astronomers usually seek out supernova remnants—neutron stars and the occasional black hole, plus their energy-wracked surroundings—by the shockwaves left behind by their catastrophic birth. Such shockwaves occur when a massive star’s core runs out of fuel, implodes, and blasts the rest of the star to smithereens. To uncover the shockwaves from this supernova duo, astronomers relied on two subtle signatures: a spherical shell structure of debris, and the glow of ejected stellar material slamming into surrounding interstellar gas.In 2023, a team using eROSITA, an X-ray telescope launched in 2019, found evidence of a plasma shell structure heated to more than a million degrees Celsius, but the telltale glow remained elusive. The glow typically shows up in radio signals; however, G189 lacked a radio signal that matched the entire shell structure. The evidence was too ambiguous to be a “smoking gun” for a second supernova remnant.A breakthrough came when astronomers looked for the glow instead in gamma rays (a higher energy form of light than radio waves). Using 16 years of data from NASA’s Fermi space telescope, a team led by Miltiadis Michailidis, a Stanford University astronomer and lead study author, found a complex gamma-ray glow that traces the X-ray shell, indicating that G189 is, in fact, the remnant of a supernova. The details are published in Nature Communications.It’s not just any supernova remnant, though. Looking deeper at the gamma-ray data, the team found the northern part of the remnant emits a totally different signal than the rest of the region. This discrepancy, they say, denotes where two different types of particles are releasing gamma rays within the expanding shockwaves. And the researchers argue this insight provides powerful clues about how these dual supernovas first came to be.Most of G189, it seems, is in a relatively matter-sparse volume of space, so the gamma-ray glow there comes from shockwave-accelerated electrons suffusing that region. However, the remnant’s northern part is aglow with gamma rays from accelerated protons—indicating the shock is interacting with a dense cloud of ionized hydrogen gas called the S249 H II region. This cloud, it just so happens, is the same one that astronomers already know the Jellyfish Nebula is interacting with—suggesting strongly that these two remnants are actual neighbors, rather than dissociated objects faraway from each other that just happen to appear close together in Earth’s sky.In subsequent computer simulations, the team established a plausible sequence of events: The two objects began as a pair, each a massive, short-lived star bound to the other by their respective gravity. When the first star exploded, the force of the explosion sent the second star flying through space. It traveled far enough that when the second star exploded, this second supernova didn’t combine with the remains of the first. Also, the “two supernova explosions occurred on a reasonably short astronomical time scale” within several thousands or tens of thousands of years of each other, says Mikako Matsuura, an astronomer at Cardiff University in the United Kingdom who was not involved in the study.By so conclusively linking these two supernovas, scientists can now measure the timing and distance between them—and use it to directly calculate, for the first time, not just the energy of a supernova but how that energy propagates through its surroundings and sends pieces of stellar shrapnel zooming through deep space. This, in turn, can help refine our bigger-picture understanding of how stars and galaxies formed.The study has major implications for studying binary star systems as well. “We only have theoretical models for the evolution of binaries and the different stages of the star’s evolution,” Michailidis says. Now, those models can be checked against actual physical observations.Additionally, these binary supernova remnants “might replicate the conditions [that existed] at an early age of the universe,” Matsuura says, when the cosmos was smaller and crammed with greater numbers of constantly interacting and short-lived massive stars. Closer scrutiny of this newfound system could therefore reveal more about the lives and deaths of these earlier, now-vanished stars.As a next step, the team is now planning to search for other binary supernova remnants. With more examples in-hand, they hope to fine-tune their theoretical models to better predict how and where these strange systems arise and evolve in the Milky Way and across the universe.It’s Time to Stand Up for ScienceIf you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.