Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentJohn Ivison: Exhibit A for why Canadians are losing faith in the justice systemThe only possible good news out of the Omar Abdul Singateh fiasco is that the passage of the bail and sentencing reform bill, C-14, should ensure that repeats of his travesty are fewLast updated 6 days ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Bill C-14 was introduced because the public was outraged by what it viewed as the government’s catch-and-release bail and sentencing provisions that prioritized the rights of criminals over the needs of vulnerable Canadians, John Ivison writes. Photo by Adobe StockLoath as I am to undermine public confidence in our institutions, the alleged shooting rampage by 25-year-old Brampton resident Omar Abdul Singateh last weekend offers a good example why so many Canadians have lost patience with the legal system.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorSingateh was arrested in Toronto in the early hours of Sunday morning, after an exchange of gunfire near the Rebel nightclub on Toronto’s waterfront that led to him stealing a rideshare car containing four passengers, and subsequently striking pedestrians. Two people, including the accused, were transferred to hospital with non-life-threatening gunshot wounds.Singateh was charged with discharging a firearm, unauthorized possession of a firearm, possessing a firearm while prohibited, robbery, and four counts of forcible confinement.The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againAs the firearm prohibition suggests, he was no novice in terms of close encounters with law enforcement.It has emerged that he was awaiting sentencing, after pleading guilty in May to driving from his home in Brampton to Montreal, where he and two accomplices beat and tortured a man until he gave them $15,000 in cryptocurrency.According to evidence filed in a Montreal courtroom, Singateh beat the man with a barbell and broke his fingers at the behest of an unknown man who he contacted via the Signal app.“Time to do a little torture,” the anonymous man said.Singateh was subsequently arrested and pleaded guilty to unlawful confinement, breaking and entering, armed robbery and assault and causing bodily harm.He was released on bail and scheduled to appear in court in October for sentencing.Apparently unbeknownst to the judge in Montreal, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida named Singateh as a member of a five-man smuggling ring that moved 100 guns into Canada. The indictment says the five individuals, at least three of whom reside in Canada, trafficked the guns from Florida to Canada in 2023 and 2024. Twenty-nine firearms were subsequently recovered from Canadian crime scenes.I say “apparently unbeknownst” because any judge who had granted bail and subsequently found out about the U.S. indictment should immediately have contacted the office of the Crown attorney and requested Singateh be brought before the court to make the case for why he shouldn’t be placed in custody.Yet, even on the merits of the Montreal case, it is inexplicable to me how any judge could leave Singateh at liberty after viewing the grisly evidence (much of which appeared in the Journal de Montréal).“This is an embarrassing case,” said one retired judge I spoke with.Singateh’s bail conditions are a matter of public record: he was on the hook to pay $3,000 if he failed to comply with the conditions and he had to surrender his passport. He was obliged to remain at home in Brampton between the hours of 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.; not communicate with a number of associates; wear an ankle bracelet; and not carry any weapons.Given we know he was caught with a banned gun last weekend, you can imagine there were other violations of the provisions in the release order signed by Court of Quebec judge Nathalie Fafard.Canada has a history of race-based sentencing and it is possible “mitigating circumstances of background” played a part (Singateh is Black).If so, the Montreal judge has done a disservice to his fellow citizens and the Charter of Rights, which says everyone has a right to “equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination.”Perhaps bail was granted with a mind to keeping a lid on the number of people in pre-trial detention (Statistics Canada says over 50 per cent of individuals in provincial and territorial prisons are on remand, rather than serving a convicted sentence). But if anyone deserves to be kept behind bars, it is Omar Abdul Singateh.The only possible good news out of all of this is that the passage of Bill C-14 should ensure that repeats of his travesty are few and far between.The bail and sentencing reform legislation passed through Parliament last month and introduces a new reverse-onus rule for violent offenders, so that the accused must show why they should be released on bail.“I’m convinced that the new provision would likely result in this individual being kept in custody, pending sentencing,” said the retired judge.He noted that his former colleagues are fiercely independent: they have customarily resisted direction from Parliament when it comes to provisions such as mandatory minimum sentencing (though, my observation is that they are less surly when their hands are tied by Supreme Court of Canada decisions).But the new legislation was introduced because the public was outraged by what it viewed as the government’s catch-and-release bail and sentencing provisions that prioritized the rights of criminals over the needs of vulnerable Canadians.“(The judiciary) is certainly not immune to the temper of the society in which they live,” said the judge.Let’s hope that Singateh finds that out for himself whenever he has his next day in court.National Post Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.