An Idaho doctor challenging vague exceptions in the state’s abortion ban testified at the start of a major trial that will test a surprising question.
Jurisprudence
June 16, 20265:45 AM
The answer may be in Dobbs.
Photo illustration by Slate. Photo by Tiziana Fabi/AFP via Getty Images.
This is part of Opinionpalooza, Slate’s coverage of the major decisions from the Supreme Court. Keep up with all of our Supreme Court coverage and analysis by signing up for weekly email roundups. The best way to support our work—and unlock exclusive legal analysis—is by joining Slate Plus. (If you are already a member, consider a donation or merch!)
Federal Judge Blocks Idaho Law Criminalizing Transgender Bathroom Use
Judge blocks Idaho bathroom ban in win for transgender advocates
The Supreme Court invented a special legal rule solely to screw Planned Parenthood
Judge rules transgender people won’t face criminal charges for using Idaho public restrooms
So Much for Leaving Abortion Up to the States
Judge rules transgender people won't face criminal charges for using Idaho public restrooms
No Criminal Charges For Transgender People Using Idaho Public Restrooms
Six transgender residents claimed that the bathroom ban, the most restrictive in the nation, violated their constitutional rights.
A recent shadow docket decision suggests that the court isn’t hungry for further legal restrictions on abortion. But there are…
Justice Clarence Thomas argues the Comstock Act, passed in 1873, prohibits the mailing of abortion medication.
The law would have made it illegal for people to use a restroom or changing facility that did not align with their sex assigned…
There have been many new difficulties in the wake of Dobbs, but they cannot allow the pro-life movement to be frustrated.
A new SCOTUS decision raises new doubts about whether a decision against a major abortion provider had any basis in law.
