The 7-to-2 decision stressed that it did not address the merits of the dispute, and concerned only whether the producers had standing to sue.
Supreme Court
Supported by
The 7-to-2 decision stressed that it did not address the merits of the dispute, and concerned only whether the producers had standing to sue.
By Adam Liptak
Reporting from Washington
Supreme Court Lets Fuel Producers Challenge California Emissions Standards
US Supreme Court lets fuel producers challenge California emissions rules
Supreme Court OKs challenge to California stricter emission standards - UPI.com
SCOTUS Judge Worries About Court Appearing To Favor ‘Moneyed Interests’ In Scathing Dissent
Trump news at a glance: Day of environmental setbacks across US after judicial and executive decisions
Supreme Court Lets Big Tobacco Pick The Judges Hearing Their Cases
The justices in a 7-2 ruling overturned a lower court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit by a Valero Energy VLO.N subsidiary and…
The dispute centred on an exception granted to California on national vehicle emission standards.
Fossil fuel companies can challenge California setting stricter emissions standards for cars, the U.S Supreme Court ruled Friday.
The court ruled in favor of the fuel industry Friday in a case Ketanji Brown Jackson argued it shouldn't have heard in the first…
Numerous state and local governments argue oil and gas companies deliberately hid the environmental impacts of fossil fuels.…
The case was a major friction point for activists in the "Make America Healthy Again" movement.
