Organizations are rushing to embed AI into core decisions, but frontline workers are left to explain outputs they neither created nor fully understand. In a multi-year field study spanning banking, recruitment, and biotechnology, researchers found that employees rarely relay AI results verbatim; they mask, amplify, or complement them depending on how the AI has been implemented. These hidden practices shape whether AI is trusted, resisted, or quietly subverted—and where professional risk lands. To minimize risk while using AI, companies need to help workers develop new interpretive roles, maintain critical scrutiny, and turn explainability from a compliance exercise into a source of learning and better decisions across the enterprise.

Research from management, cognitive science, and human-computer interaction indicates that users often accept AI-generated outputs uncritically, leading to cognitive offloading,…

Most employees said their trust in an organization depended on how it explained its AI use.