Substack shipped an AI detector this week. Every post, note, and comment over 100 words can now be...
Substack is combatting “Claudefishing.”
When AI is everywhere, offering AI-free options may be very appealing. That's the bet Substack is making.
Substack partnered with the detector Pangram so readers can scan posts for how much a human wrote versus AI. It calls the deception Claudefishing.
Substack is giving readers a way to estimate how much of a newsletter was written by AI, signaling a broader shift toward transparency around AI-assisted content.
Substack launches Pangram AI detection (July 21) to identify human-written vs AI-generated content in posts and creator drafts. Signal: subscribers value authentic authorship. Differentiator vs LinkedIn's AI glut; positions paid creator platforms on trust, not volume.
Substack integra il rilevatore Pangram: si possono analizzare post, note e commenti per stimare quanta parte del testo l'ha scritta una persona. La scommessa di Chris Best: in un feed pieno di slop, la prova di un…
Substack integra il rilevatore Pangram: si possono analizzare post, note e commenti per stimare quanta parte del testo l'ha scritta una persona. La scommessa di Chris Best: in un…
The platform is betting that subscribers value authenticity and will pay for content verifiably created by humans.