Storia in 3 fonti

Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow

Alan Turing Institute researchers made GitHub Copilot produce harmful content it refuses in chat, by spreading the request across a coding workflow.

Raccontata da

thehackernews.com

theregister.com

thenextweb.com

Confronto fonti

3 prospettive sulla stessa storia

AI · summaries

thenextweb.comStai leggendo8 g fa

Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow

Alan Turing Institute researchers made GitHub Copilot produce harmful content it refuses in chat, by spreading the request across a coding workflow.

originale

thehackernews.com9 g fa

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code | Read more hacking news on The Hacker News cybersecurity news website and learn how to protect against cyberattacks and software vulnerabilities.

Leggi questa versione → originale

theregister.com8 g fa

GitHub Copilot: Sorry Dave, I can't do that harmful thing - unless you ask me in code

More fun with AI jailbreaks, this time at the workflow level

Leggi questa versione → originale

Timeline cronologica

mercoledì 8 luglio 2026·thehackernews.com
GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code
GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code | Read more hacking news on The Hacker News cybersecurity news website and learn how to protect against…
mercoledì 8 luglio 2026·theregister.com
GitHub Copilot: Sorry Dave, I can't do that harmful thing - unless you ask me in code
More fun with AI jailbreaks, this time at the workflow level
giovedì 9 luglio 2026·thenextweb.com
Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow
Alan Turing Institute researchers made GitHub Copilot produce harmful content it refuses in chat, by spreading the request across a coding workflow.