Storia in 3 fonti

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code | Read more hacking news on The Hacker News cybersecurity news website and learn how to protect against cyberattacks and software vulnerabilities.

Raccontata da

thehackernews.com

theregister.com

thenextweb.com

Confronto fonti

3 prospettive sulla stessa storia

AI · summaries

thehackernews.comStai leggendo1 mese fa

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code

originale

thenextweb.com1 mese fa

Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow

Alan Turing Institute researchers made GitHub Copilot produce harmful content it refuses in chat, by spreading the request across a coding workflow.

Leggi questa versione → originale

Timeline cronologica

mercoledì 8 luglio 2026·thehackernews.com
GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code
GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code | Read more hacking news on The Hacker News cybersecurity news website and learn how to protect against…
mercoledì 8 luglio 2026·theregister.com
GitHub Copilot: Sorry Dave, I can't do that harmful thing - unless you ask me in code
More fun with AI jailbreaks, this time at the workflow level

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code

Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow

Timeline cronologica

GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code

GitHub Copilot: Sorry Dave, I can't do that harmful thing - unless you ask me in code

GitHub Copilot: Sorry Dave, I can't do that harmful thing - unless you ask me in code

Researchers break GitHub Copilot's safety via a workflow