Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inAllNewsSportCultureLifestyleTwo teenage boys, identified as X and Y, have been sentenced to four years' detention after the Court of Appeal ruled their initial non-custodial sentences for rape were "unduly lenient". The boys, who were 14 at the time of the first attack in Fordingbridge in November 2024, were initially spared custody by Southampton Crown Court in May. One of the victims and her family expressed that the increased sentences do not alleviate her fear and criticised the criminal justice system for its initial handling of the case. The Court of Appeal upheld the 18-month youth rehabilitation order for a third boy, Z, who encouraged X and Y in a second rape incident in January 2025, deeming it "appropriate". The victim’s parents are establishing the "Stronger than Silence" foundation to support other survivors of sexual violence and advocate for systemic change. In fullVictim’s parents say teen rapists’ new sentences ‘don’t change the fear’ daughter feelsMore bulletinsThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

Three rapist teenage boys spared jailed over a series of attacks in Fordingbridge, Hampshire, pictured, should be re-sentenced and sent to detention, the Court of Appeal heard…

Three teenage boys who avoided custody after being convicted of raping two girls should have been detained, the Court of Appeal has been told.

One of boys has been made ‘pariah’ and his family has been advised to leave their home, the Court of Appeal heard

Appeal Court judges Ms Justice Norton, Lord Justice Edis and Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr today ruled the sentences given to two rapist teenage boys were insufficient

The case was reviewed under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme after the boys were given youth rehabilitation orders by a judge who said he wanted to 'avoid criminalising these…

The case was referred to the Court of Appeal after public outcry over the boys’ sentences

First judge found to have erred by giving 15-year-olds youth rehabilitation orders for rape of two girls in Hampshire

Following public outrage over lenient sentences, two UK teen rapists have been handed four-year detention terms by an appeals judge.

The two boys were originally given youth rehabilitation orders after raping two girls; videos of the attacks were shared online.

The two boys were originally given youth rehabilitation orders after raping two girls; videos of the attacks were shared online.

Two teenage boys who were found guilty of rape have been given four years in detention after the Court of Appeal over-ruled their initial non-custodial sentences.

The decision follows widespread public outrage, with the court saying the seriousness and repeated nature of the offences made custody "unavoidable."

The 15-year-olds have now been sent to young offender institutions after carrying out violent sex attacks in an underpass in Fordingbridge, Hampshire.

Two boys were sentenced to four years’ detention on Thursday after the Court of Appeal ruled their non-custodial sentences were ’unduly lenient’

Jazmine, not her real name, was violently attacked by the two teen rapists who were then aged 14 in an underpass by the River Avon in Fordingbridge, Hampshire.

Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or…