The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a Watergate-era cap on how much money political parties may spend in coordination with candidates, siding with Republicans in a case initially filed by then-Senate candidate JD Vance that experts say could ultimately benefit the GOP in this year’s midterm election.

The ruling is broadly expected to give Republicans an edge before the November midterms.

At issue in the case was a post-Watergate law that Congress passed to limit the amount of money individuals can give to political parties.

The Supreme Court has erased limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president, striking down a federal election law that's…

In erasing limits on how much political parties can coordinate with federal candidates, the US Supreme Court on Tuesday handed Republicans a major political victory just ahead of…

The court's decision will allow political parties to spend unlimited sums in coordination with candidates.

The Supreme Court struck down federal limits on the amount of money a political committee can spend in coordination with federal candidates.

President Donald Trump took a victory lap after the ruling, writing on Truth Social that it was "A BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS."

The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a Watergate-era cap on how much money political parties may spend in coordination with candidates, siding with Republicans in a case initially…

The Supreme Court said the spending limits violate the First Amendment.

The provision challenged by Vice President JD Vance and others limits how much party committees can spend in coordination with individual candidates.

In a 6-3 decision, the court's conservative majority sided with Vice President JD Vance and other Republican challengers

The high court further loosened federal campaign finance laws, striking down a limit on coordinated spending between political parties and candidates.

Today, the Supreme Court ruled for the Republican Party and JD Vance in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, reversing previous decisions and…

Today, by a vote of 6-3, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the long-standing federal limit on campaign spending coordination between political parties and candidates. This limit…

Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or…

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to do away with limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with individual candidates.

Siding with Republicans, who have a cash advantage over the Democrats, the court ruled 6-3, saying this rejection was linked to free speech.

The Supreme Court overturned a key campaign finance restriction in a decision issued Tuesday, clearing the way for political parties nationwide to spend unlimited amounts on…

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down limits on the amount of money a political party committee can spend in coordination with a candidate.

The High Court strikes down campaign spending limits, citing First Amendment protections in a 6-3 decision