The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a Watergate-era cap on how much money political parties may spend in coordination with candidates, siding with Republicans in a case initially filed by then-Senate candidate JD Vance that experts say could ultimately benefit the GOP in this year’s midterm election.
Live TV
Listen
Watch
US
International
At issue in the case was a post-Watergate law that Congress passed to limit the amount of money individuals can give to political…
The Supreme Court overturned a key campaign finance restriction in a decision issued Tuesday, clearing the way for political…
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted restrictions on the amount of money political parties can spend in coordination with…
The Supreme Court has erased limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and…
Siding with Republicans, who have a cash advantage over the Democrats, the court ruled 6-3, saying this rejection was linked to…
The high court further loosened federal campaign finance laws, striking down a limit on coordinated spending between political…
Supreme Court strikes down limits on political party spending
Supreme Court strikes down campaign coordination limits
US Supreme Court lifts campaign spending restrictions ahead of midterms
Supreme Court strikes down limits on party spending in federal elections, backing Republican appeal
‘Big win!’ US Supreme Court again rejects cap on political campaign spending
Supreme Court opens floodgates to more coordinated campaign spending
Supreme Court strikes down coordinated campaign spending limits
Supreme Court strikes down limits on coordinated campaign spending
How the Supreme Court’s campaign finance ruling gives Republicans a major midterm boost | CNN Politics
Supreme Court strikes down limits on political parties' campaign spending, in win for GOP
