Governments currently lack the frameworks, technical expertise, and speed to evaluate and regulate such advanced AI. The result is reactive policymaking.

Fable 5 was built to help with advanced cybersecurity work. Its sudden shutdown highlights a dilemma at the heart of AI security: the same tools can aid both defenders and…

The US government crackdown on Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 hides a glaring truth: AI models with advanced hacking capabilities will soon be the norm.

The fight over Anthropic's Fable 5 is turning AI oversight from a theoretical debate into a real test of government power.

Governments currently lack the frameworks, technical expertise, and speed to evaluate and regulate such advanced AI. The result is reactive policymaking.

On June 9th, Anthropic released its Fable generative AI model. Three days later, the US government classified it as a dangerous munition, and used its export-control authority to…

The Great American AI Act from Obernolte and Trahan builds on a model for regulating complex, fast-moving technologies that my colleagues and I developed.

The Batch AI News and Insights: Over the last two weeks, both the U.S. Government and Anthropic took significant actions that demonstrated...

AI risk isn’t just about regulation or replacement. It’s about where uncertainty belongs and who absorbs the consequences when systems don’t work as planned.

This article discuss if the US government will regulated the most advanced AI models. It argues that we have hit a cap on the most advanced AI models

The latest spat between Anthropic and the government raises a broad concern among AI and safety researchers: There is no consistent framework for regulating AI.