Any transfer of wartime operational control requires agreement with the United States. That makes mutual trust within the South Korea-U.S. alliance essential.

President Lee Jae Myung’s renewed push for the transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) from Washington to Seoul is provoking discussion ove...

Since last year, the commander of US Forces Korea has commented at various public events that meeting the requirements of the OPCON transfer is more important than its timing

OPCON transfer is not an agreement on how to separate. It’s a renewed commitment that makes necessary updates to a 70-year-old framework.

WASHINGTON — The South Korea-U.S. alliance remains committed to a "conditions-based" transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) to Seoul from...

The South Korea-US alliance remains committed to a "conditions-based" transfer of wartime operational control to Seoul from Washington, a US Forces Korea offici

The Korea-U.S. alliance remains committed to a "conditions-based" transfer of wartime operational control (Opcon) to Seoul from Washington, a U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) spokesperson…

Korea has received no proposal from the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) to change its agreement to maintain the combined command structure after Seoul retakes wartime operational control…

Any transfer of wartime operational control requires agreement with the United States. That makes mutual trust within the South Korea-U.S. alliance essential.

Any transfer of wartime operational control requires agreement with the United States. That makes mutual trust within the South Korea-U.S. alliance essential.