A bench referred to the CJI the question of how SC’s ruling in Union of India Vs KA Najeeb should be applied in UAPA cases involving prolonged incarceration. | India News

A May 18 judgment held that bail remains the rule and jail the exception, and that the presumption of innocence must govern courts when considering bail under UAPA | India News

The Supreme Court said the later judgments appeared to have “invented and then destroyed” a proposition that the Najeeb verdict itself never laid down | India News