A week of Claude Code and Codex work leaves enough local evidence to answer concrete questions. When...
Weekly report on AI coding activity (tokens, sessions, models) that documents effort, not productivity. For tech managers, value lies in separating concrete data from invented metrics, avoiding false equivalencies, and grounding workflow decisions in facts.
A week of Claude Code and Codex work leaves enough local evidence to answer concrete questions.
When were sessions active? Which provider produced the activity? Which models appeared? How did the token mix change by day?
It does not prove that the code was correct, the week was productive, or an API-value estimate was money spent.
That boundary is what makes a weekly report useful.
Use local calendar days
AI coding tools are getting good enough that I wanted a simple way to understand usage across real...
In the latest Anthropic Economic Index report, we look at when people come to Claude, what they produce with it, and how they…
Token budgets are becoming the new productivity flex in Silicon Valley. But is measuring token usage just as broken as counting…
The most dangerous number in an AI coding dashboard is the one labeled cost without a definition. A...
I added real-time activity logging and security scoring to my Claude Code dashboard ...
Last month I started tracking every command I ran through Claude Code, Cursor, and Aider. After 4,788...
