Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentRob Breakenridge: OK, Carney, now approve the pipeline for realThe route chosen is the lowest hanging fruit with the least amount of oppositionLast updated 8 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced the West Coast Pipeline Project at Trans Am Piping Products in Calgary on Thursday, July 2, 2026. Gavin Young/Postmedia Gavin Young/PostmediaCALGARY — It’s quite a needle that the prime minister has threaded, weaving together announcements with B.C., Alberta, and private industry to move forward with a new million-barrel-a-day pipeline to Canada’s West Coast.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorIt’s taken a long time to get to this point, though, and we’re still really only nearing the end of the beginning. It’s unfortunate that it took months of negotiations, major concessions, and an unprecedented legislative intervention to expedite Canada’s regulatory approval process just to arrive at what is essentially the lowest-hanging fruit.It would be a terrible indictment of Canada’s ability to build major projects if all of this was somehow insufficient to move this project forward. By landing on the easiest, simplest pipeline route with the least possible amount of opposition, there should be zero excuses nowThis newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againRather than a pipeline project to a deepwater port in northwestern B.C. — the shortest distance from Canada to Asia — Alberta has settled on a route to the southwest coast. This will hew more or less to the right-of-way of the existing Trans Mountain expansion (TMX), ending at Roberts Bank port terminal in Delta, B.C.The Thursday evening announcement in Calgary was the culmination of a rather busy and consequential day for Mark Carney. The prime minister started the day in Vancouver, where he announced a new agreement with B.C. Premier David Eby.Essentially, B.C. won’t fight this new pipeline and, in exchange, will receive considerable benefits in the form of billions for resource projects and major infrastructure investments. Ottawa will also maintain the tanker ban along B.C.’s northern coast — a major political concession in B.C.’s favour.To be sure, further growing our capacity to develop and export LNG to Asian markets is a win-win for B.C. and for Canada. Still, the upside for B.C. is considerable — including the benefits that this pipeline will deliver.The tanker ban itself was always redundant and symbolic, at least based on the Liberals’ underlying logic in favour of the Impact Assessment Act. Canada’s coastline far exceeds just the B.C. north coast, and the whole point of raising the bar on environmental impact assessment was to better protect sensitive areas.Keeping the tanker ban, therefore, constitutes yet another concession from Alberta, since the original Alberta-Ottawa MOU left the door open to adjusting the ban, if necessary, to accommodate a pipeline project. There would surely have been considerable opposition to such a project, however..So yes, Alberta gets federal backing, and referral to the Major Projects Office, of a new pipeline and the fruits of Carney’s efforts to facilitate a more conducive political atmosphere.There was also Ottawa’s concession to ease the controversial Clean Electricity Regulations. That helped pave the path for Thursday’s other big announcement of a $4.6-billion natural gas project to power a new data centre near EdmontonAnd, of course, Alberta will benefit tremendously from the additional production capacity that will fill the new pipeline and be shipped off to foreign markets.But we cannot overlook the costs that fall on the province.There will be costs associated with the development of the Pathways carbon capture and storage project. The full costs are not yet known, and the major oilsands companies will be partners in that project, but this a condition for federal support. The same is true of the escalating industrial carbon price, although a recent compromise agreement will keep it from reaching its originally planned high level.And there’s also the cost of building this pipeline. Although we can expect this project, once completed, to deliver substantial revenues, there’s still the price tag of construction. It’s estimated that this pipeline will cost upwards of $35-billion to build, and the private sector has still been skittish about the risks of such an investment. In the meantime, taxpayer dollars will be in the mix.So far, there is only one private sector partner, the Pembina Pipeline Corporation, as the others involved — Trans Mountain Corp. and the Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission — are Crown entities. Ideally, there would be more private involvement and hopefully greater certainty as this project moves forward can attract more investment.Still, as the prime minister pointed out, we’re unleashing at least $200-billion in new investments across all of these projects. Premier Smith called it “transformational wealth,” constituting “an opportunity neither Canada nor Alberta can afford to leave unrealized.”Hopefully this now marks the end of the MOUs and trade-offs. We still need to see a quick decision from Ottawa with regard to designating this project to be in the national interest. The lack of such a designation in the entire first year of the Building Canada Act has not helped to build confidence in the notion that the federal government is determined to act with urgency on major projects.The prime minister and premier deserve credit for moving the ball forward on such an important initiative. The changing and growing global economic pressures we’re facing make this urgent, and the benefits we’re now realizing from TMX show that it will be worth it.And beyond just enhancing Canada’s prosperity and economic security, this comes at an important political moment for Alberta.It’s an arduous and imperfect path that’s finally brought us to a good news announcement. So no more concessions, no more MOUs. Let’s get this done. If not now, when?Rob Breakenridge is a Calgary-based podcaster and writer. He can be found at robbreakenridge.ca and reached at rob.breakenridge@gmail.com Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.