Mark Pittman is Founder of Blyncsy, Inc. & Director of Transportation AI at Bentley.gettyLos Angeles oversees one of the largest street networks in the U.S., spanning more than 6,500 miles of public roads maintained by the Bureau of Street Services. It also presents one of the most thoroughly documented cases of the consequences that arise when a municipality systematically defers maintenance without the aid of AI-driven pavement monitoring.A 2026 analysis by Streets for All modeled LA's current trajectory using the city’s own pavement condition data and budget trends. The conclusion was sobering: Without a fundamental change in approach, LA’s average pavement condition index (PCI) will drop from 71 today to 47 by 2035. At that stage, most city streets will be in a failed state, and the cost to repair them will balloon to over $15 billion. This staggering figure is the direct result of current decisions—or lack thereof—regarding which roads are treated and when.The Math Behind Deteriorating Road ConditionsStreet maintenance follows a cost curve that is rarely appreciated outside public works circles. The longer a road goes without treatment, the more expensive that treatment becomes, and the cost increase is rarely linear.According to Streets for All, a road in good condition (rated above 70 PCI) can be preserved with a slurry seal at a cost of roughly $30,000 per lane mile. Once that road slips into the "fair" range (PCI 56 to 70), standard resurfacing costs jump to $190,000 per lane mile. If it falls below a PCI of 55, full reconstruction costs soar to between $250,000 and $500,000 per lane mile, depending on the severity of the structural failure.In short, a five-year delay in maintenance can increase repair costs by 10 times. The deterioration curve also accelerates non-linearly: Pavement generally holds up for a decade after treatment before declining sharply. This means the window for low-cost intervention is incredibly narrow. Without AI-driven monitoring to identify roads approaching these critical thresholds, agencies often miss the opportunity to save millions.What LA Got Wrong, And Why That MattersLos Angeles's current crisis reflects decades of deferred maintenance and budget volatility. However, the strategy itself has been flawed, often prioritizing roads in excellent condition while allowing moderately deteriorating streets to fail completely.The city's pavement preservation budget dropped from $141 million in 2020 to just over $70 million in 2025. Consequently, the streets most in need of strategic repair have continued to worsen. Simultaneously, streets that could have been cheaply preserved have migrated into the most expensive repair categories.Compounding this, LA has shifted much of its remaining budget toward "large asphalt repair." This involves patching sections of roads to avoid triggering federal ADA access ramp requirements that are mandatory during full resurfacing. Streets for All’s analysis shows this approach costs approximately $395,000 per lane mile—more than double the cost of standard resurfacing—yet it yields no meaningful improvement in the city’s overall PCI scores.While Los Angeles is an extreme example, the underlying dynamic is a national epidemic. A Pew Charitable Trusts study of all 50 states found that 25 states reported a combined $86.3 billion funding gap over the next decade for maintaining National Highway System roads and bridges. State and local governments have accumulated an estimated $105 billion in deferred maintenance since 2004. In most cases, agencies make reactive decisions based on visible failures and complaints rather than scientific deterioration trends.The Data Problem Behind The Funding ProblemMost transportation professionals understand the cost curve; the hurdle is a lack of high-fidelity data to act on it. Traditional pavement assessment relies on periodic field surveys where inspectors manually log conditions every two to four years.This timeline is insufficient. A road rated 72 during one survey cycle can easily drop to 58 before the next, moving it from a "preservation" candidate to a "reconstruction" candidate. Without real-time updates, agencies cannot detect this transition until the window for cheap intervention has closed. Because traditional planning relies on these infrequent, sample-based assessments, it struggles to provide the current, network-wide data required to defend budget requests or prioritize spending effectively.When local roads deteriorate into the resurfacing or reconstruction categories, the financial burden inevitably spills over onto the balance sheets of regional businesses. Furthermore, deferring maintenance until a road requires complete reconstruction not only restricts customer access to local businesses, but also severely inflates fleet operating costs, saddling the average driver with roughly $725 a year in extra vehicle repairs and wasted fuel.Conversely, municipalities that proactively preserve their pavement networks signal operational competence, providing the reliable mobility necessary to attract corporate site investments and sustain long-term economic development.​​Shifting Toward Treating The Right Roads At The Right TimeThe solution lies in continuous, network-wide pavement condition data. This creates a living picture of every road segment on the deterioration curve. AI-powered condition monitoring, utilizing imagery from commercial vehicles already navigating the city, makes this visibility achievable at a fraction of the cost of manual surveys.Commercial fleets—delivery vans, buses and utility vehicles—can generate continuous dashcam footage. AI models then process this footage to detect surface distress, classify conditions and flag segments nearing treatment thresholds. This data feeds directly into asset management systems, allowing agencies to see exactly which roads are in the slurry seal window and which are about to become a liability.The Compound Cost Of WaitingThe Los Angeles case study quantifies a universal problem: What does it actually cost to keep deferring maintenance? In LA, maintaining streets in a state of good repair would require roughly $350 million annually. The current $70 million budget creates the shortfall driving the projected $15 billion backlog.Road deterioration is inevitable, but how agencies allocate funds is a choice. A dollar spent on a slurry seal at PCI 73 preserves more road than any other intervention. Finding those roads requires knowing their condition today, not three years ago.This is the fundamental argument for AI-driven pavement monitoring. It may not instantly close the funding gap, but it gives agencies the visibility to stretch limited budgets as far as they can go. It allows them to treat the roads still in the low-cost window while building a data-backed, defensible case for the funding needed to address the roads that have already passed it. By moving from reactive patching to proactive management, cities can finally break the cycle of expensive, systemic failure.Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?