Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentChristine Van Geyn: A family found ancient remains on their property. Their nightmare was just beginningThe Ontario government wants the homeowners to foot a bill that could top $1 millionLast updated 17 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.A researcher examines human remains during an excavation in Marsal, France, in 2014. Photo by FRED MARVAUX/AFPThe Reio family was supposed to be living the Canadian dream. After a lifetime of hard work, they had saved money to buy a small lot with a modest home on the shores of Lake Erie. It was where they planned to spend their retirement. The existing bungalow needed work, but the Reios were ready to build their dream. They planned a small renovation that would involve keeping the existing foundation but building a slightly larger home with a second story and two bedrooms for their adult children and, one day, maybe grandchildren. The work began in 2024, and that’s when the Reios’ nightmare began.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorWhen taking down the garage, their contractor discovered human remains. When such remains are found on a property, a legal process is triggered. Of course, police must be called to make sure it’s not a missing person or a murder victim. In this case, the police determined the remains were very old, just like those, as it turned out, that had been found on other properties all along their street. These remains are believed to be over 1,000 years old. When ancient remains are found in Ontario, it triggers a different process, an archeological one, with the potential to bankrupt property owners and prevent them from controlling their own land.This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThe process began with an order from the Registrar of Burials compelling the Reios to conduct an archeological investigation. They are legally obligated to do the investigation, and failing to do so can lead to fines and even jail time. But the Reios can’t afford it. The cost is extraordinary. One estimate put the cost at $50,000-$60,000 per week, for 10 weeks. But that’s just the beginning. No one can actually tell the Reios how much the investigation will cost, or how long it will take. If more remains are found, the dig site expands, and it could end up costing over $1 million. That’s more than the value of the property. The Reios were also told by the Registrar of Burials and the archeologist that Indigenous engagement and supervision in the investigation is mandatory, and this represents about half the costs.The Reios believe in reconciliation and in treating human remains with dignity and respect. But they simply cannot afford these costs. Yet the Registrar of Burials denied the Reios’ request for financial assistance, finding that these six-to-seven figure open-ended quotes would not be an undue financial hardship on this retirement-aged couple. In its decision denying compensation, the Registrar of Burials suggested that the Reios could pay for the investigation by taking out a line of credit and paying it back over years. It is unreasonable to apply the law in a way that forces an owner to put themselves in significant debt to undertake an investigation for the public benefit.There is a public interest in preserving human remains and archeological sites. The problem is the government is obtaining this public benefit of preserving archeological remains and expecting the Reios to suffer financial devastation to pay for it. The Reios cannot live on their property, build on it or reasonably sell it. The government is requiring them to suffer financial devastation to comply with the law, and if they fail to do so, they could face jail time.After two years, the Reios are standing up for themselves. With the support of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, they have filed a notice of application for judicial review of the decision to deny them financial assistance. The way the law has been applied is severely lacking and needs reform, as it is not working.The Reios are not asking to pave over human history. They are not asking to be exempt from the law, nor are they refusing to treat these remains with dignity and respect. They are asking a far more basic question: if preserving archaeological remains is a public good that benefits all of us, why should one ordinary family be forced to bear the entire cost alone? Governments cannot demand that citizens sacrifice their homes, their savings and their retirement to achieve a public objective and then wash their hands of the consequences. If Ontario wants to preserve archaeological sites for the benefit of society, it must also accept responsibility for providing financial assistance to the people who are forced to bear that burden. That is what reconciliation, fairness and reasonableness require.National PostChristine Van Geyn is the interim executive director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a legal charity that fights for fundamental freedoms through public interest litigation. You can support the Reios case by visiting theCCF.ca. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.