Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentKevin Klein: Human rights museum can no longer avoid questions over Nakba exhibitInternal documents obtained by National Post and Winnipeg Sun plus legal action now underway will make full transparency unavoidable You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Work on the Canadian Museum for Human Rights' controversial Nakba exhibit should be paused, writes columnist Kevin Klein. A prominent Israeli legal centre says it will be filing an injunction "soon" in order to make that happen. Photo by Adobe StockWINNIPEG, Man. — A leading Israeli legal organization is preparing to seek a court injunction to stop the Canadian Museum for Human Rights’ (CMHR’s) planned Nakba exhibit. Correspondence received this week from Joshua Z. Lavine of the Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center says the centre “is filing an injunction soon.”Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThe legal step comes after internal emails obtained by the National Post revealed co-ordination between officials at the Winnipeg museum and a representative of the Palestinian Authority on the exhibit’s content and progress.In an email dated Dec. 5, 2024, Ramsey Zeid, president of the Canadian Palestinian Association of Manitoba and a member of the museum’s Palestinian Content Advisory Network, wrote to CMHR Vice-President of Exhibitions, Matthew Cutler, and CEO Isha Khan. He said Palestinian representative Mona Abuamara would be touring the museum six days later and wanted a meeting “to discuss the Nakba exhibit.” Zeid added that Abuamara was “keen to receive an update on the progress of the project … and explore how she might be able to assist if necessary.”This newsletter from NP Comment tackles the topics you care about. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againCutler replied the next day, saying staff would speak with Abuamara “about our work around sharing Palestinian human rights stories through the museum, including the exhibit.” The Palestinian General Delegation confirmed to the National Post that the meeting occurred.Separately, emails obtained by the Winnipeg Sun show that CMHR CEO Isha Khan was simultaneously briefing senior Canadian heritage officials on the museum’s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict. In December 2023 correspondence, Khan told a senior heritage official that she wanted to update her on “a few things going on at the museum in relation to the conflict in Israel/Palestine,” including board discussions and the annual fundraising gala. The museum receives the majority of its funding from the department Khan was updating.When the National Post asked the museum last November about Jewish groups’ concerns over balance and consultation, spokesperson Amanda Gaudes described the exhibit as “neither a historical retrospective nor an examination of the founding of the State of Israel.” She called it a multimedia presentation focused on “the lived experiences of Palestinian-Canadians.” Gaudes declined to name members of the content advisory committee. The Post later obtained the 2023 list, which included Zeid. After the October 7 massacre, Zeid publicly wrote that “Zionism is a disease that must be destroyed.”Montreal lawyer Neil Oberman told the National Post there is a serious question as to whether the museum violated its mandate under the Museums Act to enhance public understanding of human rights and promote respect for others. He noted that while engagement with a foreign mission is not automatically unlawful, the lack of transparency around a foreign representative’s interest in shaping content raises serious ethical concerns. Canadian Museums Association guidelines require multiple perspectives to be presented fairly and impartially.The picture is now clear. One side in the exhibit controversy had structured advisory access and direct meetings with museum leadership about content and “assistance.” The other side moved from requests for basic consultation in 2021 to imminent court action. During that time, the museum’s CEO was briefing the federal department that funds it.Winnipeggers have a direct stake in this national museum. It exhibits influence on school programs and public understanding in our city. When internal records show co-ordination with a foreign representative, defensive public statements that downplay historical context, and simultaneous briefings to federal funders, trust in the institution erodes.The CMHR must immediately disclose the full record of its discussions with Abuamara regarding the exhibit, publish the complete list of advisory network members and their input, and explain what was communicated to Canadian Heritage officials. Until those steps are taken, work on this exhibit should be paused.A national human rights museum cannot credibly claim to promote respect and dialogue when its own processes produce litigation, questions about foreign influence, and legitimate concerns about one-sided framing. The documents obtained by the National Post and the Winnipeg Sun, together with the legal action now underway, make full transparency unavoidable.National PostKevin Klein is a former Minister in the Manitoba Government and a columnist for the Winnipeg Sun. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.