Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNewsCanadaTorontoBillionaire Frank Stronach to hear verdict in his sex assault trial after troubled prosecutionAt the trial’s outset, Frank Stronach was facing 12 charges involving seven women. By the end, it was only five charges involving three women.Last updated 21 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Frank Stronach leaves a Toronto court on Feb. 5. Photo by Peter J Thompson/National PostAnalysisEnjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorFrank Stronach, 93, the auto parts billionaire accused of preying on young women at the Toronto nightclub he owned in the 1980s and pressuring them into his condo for sex against their will, is scheduled to appear in a Toronto courtroom Friday morning to hear his verdicts.Judge Anne Molloy of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has been writing her reasons in this high profile trial in which the Ontario Crown argued Stronach followed a clear and repeated pattern of sexual predation, and was only exposed when several victims came forward in 2024 in response to news of the first few charges.At the trial’s outset in February, prosecutors claimed each woman’s story would bolster the credibility of the others, that they trusted this fabulously wealthy and sophisticated man, a casual acquaintance many decades older than they were, and accepted his invitations to see the lake view from his condo only to be set upon coarsely once inside, sexually assaulted in an entitled and almost perfunctory manner, then driven home as if this were normal.Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againBut the prosecution went sideways from the beginning.First, it was evidence that police and prosecutors had been strategizing testimony with witnesses just days before trial, and helping them to avoid inconsistencies or “omissions,” by failing to mention details that would be important to this legal claim of a similar fact pattern.Then, the witnesses themselves in some cases undermined their own claims, in one case by admitting to lying on the stand about what she had read about other complainants’s stories, and then trying to apologize from the witness stand, only to be silenced by the judge who said it was not an opportunity to make a speech. She claimed Stronach sexually assaulted her after a dinner with him to mark the end of her summer internship at his company, Magna, a job arranged through her mother because her late father had been friends with Stronach. Frank Stronach at an annual meeting of Magna International Inc. in Toronto in 1987. Photo by John Felstead / The Canadian PressSome complainants were so confrontational and combative with Stronach’s defence counsel they had to be cautioned by the judge to just answer questions.One woman had an emotional breakdown on the witness stand to the point that emergency support services were required. Her testimony had been completely disjointed by anxiety — “garbled,” as the judge put it — and she was incapable of listening or answering questions. Judge Molloy excused the witness from her cross-examination, and the Crown conceded it no longer had a reasonable prospect of convicting Stronach on the charges involving her.The judge also indicated she would be unable to convict on the two charges relating to the first complainant to testify, whose timeline of the alleged sexual assault fell apart under cross examination to the point it was not clear even which year it was supposed to have happened.Another complainant was revealed in cross-examination to have an extensive history of controversial business litigation involving what a civil judge has described as her deceit and dishonesty, and a more recent instance of allegedly falsely reporting to police that a man she had a dispute with threatened to kill her.Additionally, one charge of rape was abandoned after the complainant’s testimony turned out to be incapable of sustaining the required elements of that charge, though an indecent assault charge in her case remains.At the trial’s outset in February, Stronach was charged with 12 alleged sexual offences involving seven women, including indecent assault, forcible confinement and the outdated charge of rape, a crime replaced in 1983 by the Criminal Code section on sexual assault.But over the course of the trial that total has been reduced to five charges involving three women. The December 1982 edition of Canadian Interiors magazine features an article on Rooney’s, A Toronto bar owned by Frank Stronach at the time and now a key location in his sexual assault prosecution. Photo by Ontario Superior Court exhibitThose that remain include a former server at Stronach’s nightclub, Rooney’s, who was fired and agreed to dinner with Stronach to discuss her employment. She was about 20, he about 50, and she testified about agreeing to see his condo because his “fatherly” demeanour was reassuring. He is alleged to have groped her and tried to kiss her as he helped her with her coat.Another was a dinner followed by sexual intercourse in Stronach’s condo.Another was a dinner at Rooney’s followed by an invitation to a different condo that Stronach’s defence denies he ever owned or used. This complainant testified he attempted sexual intercourse by force but she refused and left.Stronach’s defence has argued the third one is fabricated, and the other two were physical encounters that actually happened and either were consensual, or Stronach had an honest but mistaken belief that they were, which is a legal defence to sexual assault.The Crown argued in its closing statements that, notwithstanding all the abandoned charges, it believes it has proven these remaining charges beyond a reasonable doubt.Regardless of Friday’s verdicts, Stronach still faces another sexual assault trial involving six different complainants in York Region, with more recent allegations, from 1988 to as recently as 2024. Jury selection is scheduled to begin next May.Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.