By Menahem Merhavey
The emerging U.S.-Iranian cease-fire framework invites a deceptively simple question: Who won the war? It is also the wrong question. Iran did not defeat the United States and Israel, nor did the Islamic Republic collapse under military pressure. What matters now is what Tehran managed to preserve, what it permanently lost, and whether a battered regime can convert a negotiated respite into political survival without unleashing the public expectations it has spent years repressing.
By Menahem Merhavey
The emerging U.S.-Iranian cease-fire framework invites a deceptively simple question: Who won the war? It is also the wrong question. Iran did not defeat the United States and Israel, nor did the Islamic Republic collapse under military pressure. What matters now is what Tehran managed to preserve, what it permanently lost, and whether a battered regime can convert a negotiated respite into political survival without unleashing the public expectations it has spent years repressing.
The reported framework centers on extending the cease-fire, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, relaxing some restrictions on Iranian oil sales and ports, and leaving the nuclear dispute for further negotiations. Iran has therefore achieved something real: After absorbing an extraordinary assault, it has compelled the United States to negotiate over the economic and maritime pressure it was still capable of imposing. But that is not the same as victory. It is the bargaining position of a wounded state that retained enough disruptive power to prevent its enemies from dictating terms unilaterally.
