Most teams building LLM applications start with RAG for a good reason. It is practical, easy to understand, and usually good enough for a simple AI use case.
But once users stop asking simple lookup questions and start asking relationship-heavy questions, standard RAG can get shallow fast.
The issue is not that RAG is bad. The issue is that many real questions are not just about finding a relevant paragraph. They are about following connections across people, products, systems, documents, events, or dependencies.
That is the gap GraphRAG tries to fill.
RAG vs GraphRAG












