A Meta Oversight Board study found that leading AI chatbots are far more willing to criticise democratic leaders than authoritarian ones — raising fears the technology is quietly extending state censorship across borders.

A study shows major artificial intelligence models are likely to refuse to criticize restrictive leaders worldwide.

A study shows major artificial intelligence models are likely to refuse to criticize restrictive leaders worldwide

Major AI systems show bias against criticizing restrictive leaders and governments. These models are more likely to refuse prompts targeting leaders in China and Saudi Arabia.…

A Meta Oversight Board study found that leading AI chatbots are far more willing to criticise democratic leaders than authoritarian ones — raising fears the technology is quietly…

Meta Oversight Board study reveals AI chatbots refuse politically sensitive content 34% of the time for authoritarian regimes vs 14% for democracies.

The study found bots even answer differently based on language too — ChatGPT calls China "not a democracy" in English, but hedges in Chinese.

A Meta-funded Oversight Board study found leading AI models are twice as likely to refuse to criticise repressive governments, shaping political speech.

The Oversight Board is trying to branch out and see other people.