A Wall Street Journal investigation found that the prediction market paid content creators to produce videos of fake trades purporting to show big financial gains.

Polymarket avrebbe pagato creator e influencer per pubblicizzare sui social delle finte vincite in modo da attirare nuovi utenti: ecco i risultati di un'indagine del Wall Street…

A Polymarket-backed platform raised $1.5 million in a funding round to help build tools to detect suspicious trading activity.

A Wall Street Journal investigation found 70% of Polymarket promotional videos featured fabricated bets totaling $1.9M, raising concerns about deceptive

A Wall Street Journal probe found Polymarket paid creators to post 1,100 videos with fake trades and nearly $1.9M in fabricated winnings on dummy websites.

A bipartisan pair of senators pressed regulators to scrutinize the prediction market’s deceptive marketing. An investigation has already been underway.

Senators are demanding for the CFTC to investigate Polymarket following reports that it paid creators to stage fake winning bets.

Polymarket is facing increased scrutiny, including a new lawsuit that claims the platform participated in deceptive marketing practices.

The probe comes after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Department of Justice dropped previous inquiries into Polymarket last July.

The request follows a report alleging Polymarket paid social media influencers to film trades on fake websites.

A Wall Street Journal investigation found that the prediction market paid content creators to produce videos of fake trades purporting to show big financial gains.

Bipartisan senators urge CFTC to investigate Polymarket over fake winning-bet video allegations, adding to the platform's long regulatory history.

The CFTC is investigating Polymarket over staged trades and fabricated wins following Bloomberg’s June 26 report, a senators’ letter, and the WSJ’s .9M fake-bets investigation.

The CFTC is investigating Polymarket over staged trades and misleading creator videos, expanding scrutiny beyond a previous $1.4M settlement from 2022.