Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget by April despite 95% engineer adoption. Leadership questions whether rising AI spending delivers real consumer value.

Operations chief Andrew Macdonald said he's not seeing proportional productivity gains from increasing AI costs within Uber.

Microsoft and Uber reveal that AI tools, initially expected to reduce expenses, are proving more costly than human labor due to operational challenges.

Two stories landed in the same news cycle. Microsoft cancelled most internal Claude Code licenses....

Microsoft and Uber both blew past 2026 AI coding budgets in months. Token-based pricing turns engineer-loved tools into runaway costs. Three controls every CFO needs.

There’s no clear connection between AI usage and productivity.

Uber exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget by April despite 95% engineer adoption. Leadership questions whether rising AI spending delivers real consumer value.

Uber CTO previously noted that the Claude Code budget for the entirety of 2026 had been spent by April.

Andrew Macdonald said rising token costs from Claude Code aren't translating into more consumer features, while the company has already burned through its 2026 AI budget

Breaking: “Uber COO Andrew Macdonald said he’s not seeing proportional productivity gains from increasing AI costs.”

Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI budget by mid-April and now says it can't link surging AI tool usage to better consumer features. Here's why it matters.

The rideshare giant's COO says “it’s very hard to draw a line” between rising AI costs and useful features for customers.

The productivity returns and the financial commitments are not correlating yet, according to Uber COO.