HomeAI · summaries
Storia in 5 fonti
Ban on Authors Who Submit AI Content “Welcome but Unenforceable”
Research integrity experts commend arXiv’s crackdown on bogus AI-written citations but warn it may be impossible to police at scale.
Confronto fonti
5 prospettive sulla stessa storiaTimeline cronologica
- ·
sciencealert.com
'AI Slop' Is Flooding Science Publishing, And One Major Site Is Fighting Back
The preprint website arXiv has announced that researchers who have put their names to papers that included errors clearly generated by artificial intelligence (AI) will face a…
- ·
timeshighereducation.com
Ban for authors submitting AI content ‘welcome but unenforceable’
Research integrity experts commend arXiv’s crackdown on bogus AI-written citations but warn it may be impossible to police at scale
- ·
nature.com
Daily briefing: Bogus citations will get you banned from arXiv
arXiv’s stance on AI-hallucinated references is a good start, but not tough enough, say some researchers. Plus, the brain’s code seems to be in constant flux and how to learn to…
- ·
nrc.nl
Arxiv doet leveranciers van AI-gegenereerde nepwetenschap in de ban
De wetenschap raakt vervuild door troep in artikelen: niet-bestaande bronnen, teksten die zo vanuit ChatGPT zijn gekopieerd. Archief-site Arxiv neemt opnieuw maatregelen.
- ·
insidehighered.com
Ban on Authors Who Submit AI Content “Welcome but Unenforceable”
Research integrity experts commend arXiv’s crackdown on bogus AI-written citations but warn it may be impossible to police at scale.