Google’s penalty for being a search monopoly does not include selling Chrome.

A case over the US tech giant's dominance in internet search is only a partial win for the firm.

In a landmark antitrust case, Judge Amit P. Mehta ruled on Tuesday that Google must hand over some of its search data to rivals but did not grant the government’s biggest requests.

Il motore di ricerca però non potrà siglare contratti esclusivi per la ricerca e dovrà condividere i dati

The ruling comes nearly a year after a U.S. judge ruled that Google holds an illegal monopoly in its core market of internet search.

Judge says tech giant can keep world’s most popular browser in ongoing battle over firm being ruled monopoly

Google will have to give up search data to competitors but can keep its Chrome browser, a federal judge ruled in the landmark antitrust case.

Google’s penalty for being a search monopoly does not include selling Chrome.

The ruling removes a big concern for investors who view the web browser and the Android operating system as key pieces of Google’s business.

The judge’s decision positions Google to keep its search business running largely without interruption.

Google will not be forced to sell off Chrome or its Android operating system, but will have to share some of its search engine data with competitors.

Judge Amit Mehta rejected the government's demand that the tech giant sell its web browser as part of a major antitrust case. He instead imposed sweeping requirements to restore…

Google's penalty for being a search monopoly does not include selling Chrome.

A federal judge ordered steps in the search monopoly case that will restrain Google but not break it up, signaling a cautious antitrust approach by courts.

The EU could seek to break up Google’s ad division.