The latest Labor Day weekend controversy pitted conservatives against one another over a White House proposal to open up childcare subsidies to stay-at-home parents. Some conservatives argue it is a good idea to divert funds from childcare centers and reward parents raising their children, while others argue that this is yet another welfare program. The reality is this is a premature controversy. There are no details yet on the proposal, but both sides of the debate make important points the federal government should consider if it truly wishes to help families.The proposed rule at stake has not been made public, but it would reportedly open a 1990-created fund to provide $12 billion in block grants to the states called the Child Care and Development Block Grant. States are currently allowed to use their funds to give vouchers to poor parents to send their children to childcare centers, as well as a host of related activities. The proposed rule, reportedly, would allow but not require states to use their funds to pay poor married couples a cash sum of up to $9,000 per year if one of the two parents stays home with the child and the other works at least 35 hours per week.If the proposal is finalized as reported, it would have several immediate impacts. While Democratic states would be unlikely to make any changes to their programs, in states that do open their program, there would be an incentive for eligible cohabitating couples with children to legalize their marriage and receive the subsidies, though the number of people in this situation is unclear. Second, there would be fewer funds available to give vouchers for single and married parents alike to send their children to child care centers. These two incentives seem to be exactly in line with the policy’s intent.