Nigeria’s dependence on imported textiles is not simply a trade problem. It is evidence of a broken industrial value chain that once linked cotton farmers, factories, traders and households, and whose decline is now costing the country jobs and weakening family incomes.

The contradiction is difficult to ignore. Nigeria has land suitable for cotton cultivation, a long history of textile production and one of Africa’s largest consumer markets. Yet, its shops increasingly depend on fabrics and finished textile products made elsewhere. China, India, and Pakistan capture much of the manufacturing value, while Nigerian consumers drive demand.

The cost of this dependence is higher than the value of the imports. When a textile factory closes or operates below capacity, the losses spread through the economy. Cotton farmers lose reliable industrial buyers. Transporters lose contracts. Ginners, dyers, tailors, designers and traders lose customers. Communities that once depended on factory wages see household spending weaken.

That makes textile revival as much a social and employment policy as an industrial one.

Nigeria cannot rely on agriculture alone to absorb its rapidly growing working-age population. It needs labour-intensive industries capable of creating jobs at scale and generating demand across connected businesses. Textiles are particularly suited to this because the value chain extends from cotton cultivation and ginning to spinning, weaving, dyeing, garment production, transport, packaging, retail and fashion. When these activities happen domestically, the economic benefits multiply.