US President Donald Trump launched the February offensive against Iran despite explicit warnings from his intelligence chief, vice president and senior military advisers that the conflict could trigger a global energy crisis and lead to a more hard-line Iranian leadership, The Wall Street Journal reported.
According to people familiar with pre-war meetings, then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told Trump that killing Iran’s supreme leader would likely “usher in a more hard-line” successor and force the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which one-fifth of global oil and gas trade passes.
US Vice President JD Vance also advocated a more “cautious,” negotiation-first approach, arguing that a diplomatic deal would be less costly than a war with “unwieldy consequences.”
While top military officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, briefed Trump on “decisive” strike options, other officials raised concerns about munitions shortages and risks to an “overstretched force.” Trump reportedly dismissed those concerns, suggesting the military could “handle any problems” as they arose.
READ: Qatar says new US sanctions on Iran ‘unilateral’
