A significant majority of Britons do not want taxpayers to fund the security for Prince Harry and Meghan on their return to the UK, a poll has shown.It was announced last week the Duke and Duchess of Sussex would be moving back after six years in the US as their children prepare to start at new schools in the UK.Concerns have been raised over who would fund the protection Harry and his family want – after he previously battled the Home Office over the fees. Seven out of ten people, or 71 per cent of those questioned in a new survey, have said Harry's family security charges should not be paid by the Government.Some 87 per cent said the Sussexes' private funds should fund all or at least a majority of the security costs, according to the poll of 2,128 British adults.And 52 per cent suggested the King's private funds should fund all, a majority or some of the fees.Disputes over whether taxpayers should fund security for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been dragging on, amid claims a review by the risk management board of the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) was completed last month.Harry and Meghan's children Archie, seven, and five-year-old Lilibet have been enrolled at British schools and will start classes in September.Meghan and Harry are seen here at Bondi Beach during their visit to Australia in April this year - the couple are returning to live in the UK, with questions over how their security will be fundedIt is thought they will live at a private, non-royal residence outside London – with suggestions they could be moving to the Cotswolds.Since leaving for the US they have been living in Montecito, California, while also owning a holiday home in Portugal. The King was said to have been taken aback by learning of the homecoming plans only days before it was made public – having not been told when Harry and Meghan met him on their visit to Britain last month.On their imminent return to the UK, the Sussexes' status will remain the same, with the couple not being offered a 'half in, half out' option when it comes to their roles.Other non-working royals such as Harry’s cousins Peter Phillips, Zara Tindall and Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie do not receive police protection. Andy Burnham last week refused to be drawn on the matter, with the Prime Minister saying the Duke and Duchess’s security – which could cost £5million a year – was a 'private matter'. A previous YouGov poll last week found fewer than a quarter of Britons believe Harry, 41, and 45-year-old Meghan should move back to the UK.Harry and ex-Suits star Meghan, who were married at St George's Chapel in Windsor in May 2018, were once dubbed part of the 'Fab Four' with the then-Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – now the Prince and Princess of Wales.But in March 2019, Buckingham Palace announced Harry and Meghan would set up their own household, breaking from the joint operation they had with William and Kate amid reports of rifts between the two couples.