Lindsay Clancy‘s supporters want to stifle men’s opinions about a mother murdering her children. The trial has generated a lot of opinions in the nation’s political discourse, but none of them are welcomed by men who want accountability for Clancy’s filicide. Many of the murdering mothers’ supporters have cited in gatherings, demonstrations, social media posts, or disturbing TikTok videos that men don’t get to have an opinion on it because they are men, and Clancy is a woman. And, because of this difference in genders, men should be silenced from commenting about the court case of the mother who coordinated the premeditated murder of her three young children. Why? Because, as some have regularly argued, men cannot understand a woman in this scenario because women are the ones to give birth, as if one needs to bear children to understand the horrors of filicide. It’s rather sexist, prejudiced, and outright misandrist. It’s also illogical. After all, if a man’s voice is not welcomed in the Clancy case, then why did she hire a male attorney to represent her instead of a female one? In many instances, I have personally read comments by women suggesting men are unqualified to discuss a mother murdering her children simply because they are men. This despicable trend continued even more when the conversation involved discussions about postpartum depression. The anti-male discrimination and desire to suppress men’s opinions is a harrowing reality of the ills of generations being indoctrinated with the toxic tenets of feminism, particularly third-wave and fourth-wave feminism. Regardless, men are allowed to have opinions — and valid opinions — about a mother murdering her three young children and a father having his three young children murdered by his wife.