Get the latest news and updates from Dawn
WARS are generally assessed through a binary lens. Strategic analysts, policymakers and the media tend to focus on a simple question — who won and who lost? The recent US-Iran war has generated a similar debate. Has Washington been able to achieve its objectives? Has Iran successfully withstood American military pressure and preserved its capacity to resist?
But this binary framework overlooks another, often more consequential, dimension of modern warfare. Wars do not merely produce military winners and losers. They also redistribute wealth, accelerate technological change and create commercial opportunities for industries positioned to profit from insecurity. In the case of the US-Iran conflict, the most obvious beneficiaries may ultimately be neither Washington nor Tehran.
The two capitals have both paid a substantial price. They have expended military resources, suffered economic disruption and experienced varying degrees of tactical and strategic pain. The conflict may therefore produce no clear geopolitical victor. Yet several sectors have emerged as unmistakable commercial winners.
The foremost beneficiary of the US-Iran conflict has been the defence industry. Modern wars consume extraordinary quantities of missiles, interceptors, drones, precision-guided munitions and other military equipment. Every missile fired has to be replaced. Every depleted stockpile creates new procurement requirements. Every perceived vulnerability generates pressure for additional defence spending. The financial results of major US defence companies illustrate this dynamic.
