Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNewsAs Trump readies wildfire retaliation, there's no silver bullet for forest managementTrump said on Sunday that he now has a finalized plan to punish Canada for the smokeLast updated 24 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.The US Capitol, Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial are seen through haze caused by wildfire smoke from Canada from the Netherlands Carillon in Arlington, Virginia on July 17, 2026. Photo by KENT NISHIMURA /AFP via Getty ImagesWASHINGTON, D.C. — Hundreds of wildfires are burning across North America, putting communities, buildings, and firefighters at risk.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorWith blazes in Washington state, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, California, Utah, and in Canada, especially in British Columbia, Ontario, and the Northwest Territories, there have been plenty of headlines about the devastation.Last month, smoke from Canadian boreal forest fires poured into the United States, triggering air quality alerts for more than 120 million Americans. Influencers and media outlets shared dramatic footage and discussed the air quality in cities like New York and Chicago as smog blanketed their regions.Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againFour Republican lawmakers accused Canada of failing to do enough to prevent wildfire smoke from hitting the United States, claiming that “continued inaction” was “unacceptable.”President Donald Trump also expressed frustration.“The United States is being unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air,” he said, claiming it was “willful negligence” and that Canada is “not properly maintaining” its forests. Trump threatened to impose new levies over it, and his administration has since introduced new tariffs against Canada, citing retaliatory tariffs and forced labour practices — not wildfires — in doing so.But Trump said on Sunday that he now has a finalized plan to punish Canada for the smoke. He refused to share details, simply saying, “you’ll find out.”Forest management experts say Trump is oversimplifying a much more complicated problem.The U.S. and Canada have forests that are different in structure, but both now face many of the same fire pressures, says Lori Daniels, a professor of forest and conservation sciences at the University of British Columbia.Canada’s forests are mostly public lands managed by provinces and territories, while the U.S. has far more private forestland and a fragmented federal-state system. Both countries, Daniels explained, use the same broad suppression tools, but Canada has a scale problem: it has far more forest, fewer people, and remote boreal areas where lightning-started fires can be nearly impossible to reach.Robert Bonnie, co-founder of Sage Agronomics and the former under secretary for Farm Production and Conservation at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, likened forest management and wildfire to a debt that has grown over time. “There are ways that we’re having to pay that debt: We’re getting bigger fires, more extreme fires, a lot of smoke.”“If we want to pay down the debt, we have to invest in restoration,” he said, referring to the need to thin smaller trees, use prescribed fires, reintroduce fire where appropriate, and manage stands so they’re more resilient and less likely to carry crown fires.John Bailey, an associate forestry professor at Oregon State University, says thinning and prescribed burns are fundamentally about fuel management, which means reducing ladder and surface fuels so fires are less likely to climb into the crowns of trees, where they often burn catastrophically.“Thinning and prescribed burning helps us with some particularly problematic components of that fuel equation,” he said.He says the U.S. has known of this need for decades but has been slow to do it at the needed pace and scale, largely because of budgets, a lack of commercial markets for small-diameter wood (clearing them brings no profit), local and state smoke rules, liability concerns, and not having enough trained professionals.So, instead of doing what’s needed, he said, “the fuels have just continued to accumulate.”Daniels said both countries need to move away from the postwar mindset of fire suppression and commercial-timber forestry where possible, and toward management that reflects today’s hotter, drier conditions.“In Canada, temperatures have increased by more than one degree Celsius, and in the north, where those fires are having huge consequences, many of those areas have warmed more than two degrees Celsius,” she said.Those areas have also experienced multi-year droughts, while forests grew denser after Indigenous burning practices were banned and suppression became the dominant policy, Daniels noted.Even doing everything right won’t stop fires, she explained.“Doing those improvements isn’t going to stop wildfires,” she said. “We are going to be living with more and more fire on our landscape.”Bonnie also noted that the old ways won’t be enough.“Even if Canada was doing everything right with climate change, there are things that are going to burn hotter and more aggressively than they used to,” he said.Jonathan Boucher, researcher at the Canadian Forest Service, agrees that thinning trees, adding fuel breaks, conducting prescribed burning, and setting up defensible spaces near communities can help, but they cannot stop every fire.“I don’t think the problem is forest management. I think the problem is climate.”Bonnie also made it clear that Trump’s comments were not just wrong, but counterproductive.The U.S. has underinvested in fire prevention and restoration, Bonnie said, and Trump has made the problem worse by cutting Forest Service capacity and resources.Meanwhile, climate change is making forests drier faster, worsening fires, and forcing new management approaches.“If you’re going to complain about your neighbors, then maybe you shouldn’t be part of the problem that’s causing climate change and making this problem worse,” he said.“Our agencies work together. We’re going to throw smoke your way. You’re going to throw smoke our way. Let’s work together to make sure we can restore our forests in a way that we can contain this problem going forward.”National PostOur website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.