The first session ended at post 10. The design did not. I came back to it and, before writing a single new decision, asked the least glamorous question a solo project can ask itself: how far along is this, really, and what would it take to call it ready for someone else to review in depth?
The answer was more useful than I expected, because it forced a distinction I had been blurring: a settled mechanism is not a hardened design.
The fork: promote now, or hold and harden
Composition was already reconciled into the binding docs. Coherence had seventeen recorded decisions covering the whole load-bearing core: binding, determinism, precedence, persona content, gender, explainability, detection, activation, the explicit accessor, and a second entity proving the abstraction generalizes. It was tempting to call that reviewable and promote it too.
A: promote coherence into the binding docs now.
