I want to start with a failure, because it taught me more than the wins.
We built an AI code review bot.
It was wired directly into pull requests.
The pitch was simple.
AI reviews first, then humans just approve the good stuff.
I want to start with a failure, because it taught me more than the wins. We built an AI code review...
A code review AI failed after 90 days: 65%+ devs found it useless, adding 0.5 days to PR cycle because noisy suggestions eroded trust. Noisy automation doesn't save time—it erodes velocity. Platform bets need 90-day validation cycles with kill criteria upfront, not roadmap-driven decisions.
I want to start with a failure, because it taught me more than the wins.
We built an AI code review bot.
It was wired directly into pull requests.
The pitch was simple.
AI reviews first, then humans just approve the good stuff.

The Problem Every team has unwritten rules. "We don't use inline comments." "Early returns only." "No...

Over the past few months, I've been exploring how AI agents can fit into a modern CI/CD pipeline—not...

AI coding tools boosted development speed by 21–35%, but PR review capacity didn't scale with it. Reviewers became the…

AI Code Review Without the Theatre I've been running LLM-powered code reviews on our team...

Six months ago I started running every non-trivial piece of code through AI before it shipped. Not...

AI-generated code fails in ways human code doesn't. After reviewing hundreds of AI PRs, I built a 4-round review protocol that…