Jul 1, 2026, 12:29 p.m. 4 min read(Antoine Schibler/Unsplash)SummaryMiCA is now in full effect but the European Commission is already looking at what aspects of its regulatory framework need updating.When MiCA was drafted between 2020 and 2023, lawmakers were primarily focused on exchanges and other CASPs. Since then, stablecoins have become central to global payments systems, to which regulators have tried to respond with the composition of their own frameworks.Sebastian Barling, financial regulation partner at Skadden, compared the EU's approach to stablecoins to building a "fortress."The European Union's (EU) transitional grandfathering period under its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation ends on July 1, forcing crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) who have yet to attain full licensing under the framework to cease operations in the bloc.While MiCA is now in full effect in theory, the European Commission is already looking considering which aspects of its regulatory framework need updating. The EU's executive branch initiated a consultation in May to assess whether MiCA was still fit for purpose given how the cryptocurrency industry has evolved over the last few years, especially given newer frameworks in other major markets.The consultation is not a sign that MiCA fell short, however, according to Patrick Hansen, Circle's director of EU strategy and policy."Being the first comprehensive crypto regulatory framework in the world, it was clear from the early days that it would be frequently reviewed with the pace of the crypto-asset and stablecoin markets," Hansen told CoinDesk. "It makes sense to treat it more or less like a version one. Some things work well, and now let's go back to the drawing board and adjust what's working potentially less well compared to other frameworks in the world," Hansen added. First-mover disadvantageStablecoins – tokens pegged to the value of a traditional financial asset, usually a fiat currency – appear to be the standout case of something working "less well" under MiCA, given comparisons with the GENIUS Act for regulating stablecoins in the U.S.When MiCA was drafted between 2020 and 2023, lawmakers were primarily focused on exchanges and other crypto asset service providers (CASPs). Since then, stablecoins have been used more frequently across parts of the global payments landscape, and regulators have sought to respond by shaping the composition of their own frameworks."CASPs were more of a focal point when MiCA was drafted because at that time there were growing concerns with respect to different providers that could freely offer services because crypto assets weren't regulated in any way, shape or form," Eva Legler, counsel for financial institutions regulatory at multinational law firm Skadden, told CoinDesk. "At that point, stablecoins hadn't grown to be as popular as they are these days."Nevertheless, MiCA has achieved many of its original goals, according to Hansen. There are around 20 euro-denominated stablecoins that have been authorized by the regime, with adoption buoyed by their formal regulation.It's not perfect, though, he added, pointing to reserve rules that require minimum bank deposits. Attention is also shifting beyond domestic regulation to global oversight. The next phase of policymaking could focus on allowing tokens regulated in one jurisdiction to circulate in another through mutual recognition regimes."We could benefit from the global, internet-native nature of these assets instead of fragmenting their circulation through locally fragmented rulebooks," he said.The EU may have had something of a first-mover disadvantage with regard to regulating crypto assets, as there was no framework in major markets like the U.S or Hong Kong to work with like there is now. Fortress EuropeSebastian Barling, partner for financial institutions regulatory at Skadden, compared the EU's approach to building a "fortress.""The consultation is clearly a serious review intended to make sure the European regime aligns internationally and remains competitive," he told CoinDesk.Barling and Legler explored the Commission’s pivotal shift toward evaluating a third-country equivalence regime and managing cross-border multi-issuance structures in a recent article. They highlighted that while MiCA currently lacks a mechanism to defer to foreign frameworks, an equivalence regime could transform the market by enabling mutual recognition and allowing globally circulating stablecoins to be listed on EU exchanges. Simultaneously, the Commission has acknowledged that multi-issuance arrangements are not strictly prohibited. Still, it is considering tighter redemption safeguards to shield EU consumers from sudden liquidity shocks and cross-border stress scenarios."Requiring separate issuance and liquidity pools across jurisdictions risks undermining the efficiency that makes stablecoins valuable in the first place," Barling told CoinDesk.Another factor in the Commission's review of MiCA could be the recognition that blockchain-based finance is already moving beyond stablecoins and into the functions they enable, such as tokenisation of real-world assets."I think 2025 was probably the year of stablecoins," Barling said. "This year I've spent much more time talking about the broader tokenization of assets."The Commission's challenge will be striking the right balance between opening the European market to global liquidity while preserving the consumer protections that helped make MiCA a global benchmark."You can't regulate away risk, but the intention here is to reduce it as much as possible and that will be one of the guidelines when making amendments to MiCA," Legler said. AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.12345678910Building the Zcash Machine: Tachyon and Quantum ReadinessBuilding the Zcash Machine: Tachyon and Quantum ReadinessZcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.Jun 30, 2026Zcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.Why it matters:Zcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.View Full Report