SynopsisIn Bengal, the new trend of tossing eggs at politicians is criticized as an unproductive method of protest. The author emphasizes that eggs should serve their purpose as a nutritious food item rather than be wasted. To make a stronger statement, the piece recommends using Roshogollas, an emblem of prosperity, allowing protestors to express disdain in a sweet yet unforgettable manner.Eggs, fresh or festering, have long been the projectile of choice for the disgruntled citizen. Yet, the practice - now revived as Bengal's most preferred form of venting against members of the previous government - is both economically and gastronomically indefensible. Consider the humble egg: a marvel of protein packaging, a breakfast cornerstone, and - when hurled - a sticky waste of omelette potential. To squander it on the scalp of a neta is to deny society a poached future. Worse, rotten eggs, though famously pungent, merely advertise poor fridge management. At least the resultant hydrogen sulfide produced from bacteria breaking down sulfur-containing amino acids may been better used for industrial purpose in an industry-starved state.If one must indulge in culinary protest, why not aim higher? Roshogolla, that shimmering symbol of excess, makes a far sharper point. A dollop of the ball's syrup sliding down a ministerial lapel conveys disdain with taste. The economics are equally persuasive. Eggs are cheap, their loss unnoticed. Roshogollas are, however, worth their rotund rupees. To fling them is to demonstrate not only contempt but also reckless affluence, a gesture that will be remembered long after the dry cleaner has despaired. Moreover, the optics are superior. An egg splat is slapstick. Roshogolla spatter is sweet pent-up revenge. ...moreElevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea.Subscribe Now