The Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Wolford v. Lopez on Thursday confirms our worst fears about the supermajority’s Second Amendment jurisprudence.
Jurisprudence
By
Mark Joseph Stern
Enter your email to receive alerts for this author.
Sign in or create an account to better manage your email preferences.
The Supreme Court’s embarrassing new Second Amendment decision, explained
The vampire rule comes for the Second Amendment
The Supreme Court’s Gun Rulings Are Cherry-Picking American History
The Burden Of History: Justice Jackson's Curious Call To Overturn Critical 2nd Amendment Precedent
Supreme Court will consider striking down assault weapons bans, in Connecticut and the Chicago-area
Supreme Court invalidates Hawaii gun possession law
Supreme Court decisions on immigration, guns and weedkiller: 6 takeaways
The Supreme Court’s War on Congress
Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii's Gun Restrictions In Major Second Amendment Case
Every Second Amendment case handed down by this Court is arbitrary, because the Court’s leading precedent makes no sense.
The latest Second Amendment case is just the latest to highlight the chaos wrought by the high court’s new “history and…
On Monday, the Supreme Court banished any doubt that it has claimed absolute authority to reshape the federal government as it…
The Supreme Court ruled on Wolford v. Lopez, No. 24-1046 — and the question it answered sounds almost whimsical.
How exactly did these six justices come together in such an important case?
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says the Supreme Court's historical test for gun laws is 'unworkable' and needs to go.
