In one of her last acts as director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released hundreds of pages of files related to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s role in the debate over the origins of COVID-19, including his alleged efforts to shape intelligence assessments and his testimony to Congress. These files do more than revive old questions about Fauci’s credibility. They show that many of the people dismissed as conspiracy theorists deserved to be taken seriously.From the lab-leak theory of COVID-19’s origin to questions about gain-of-function research, voices across social media and even inside the government were ignored, ridiculed, or silenced. The media often framed skepticism about China’s role in the pandemic as xenophobia and reported extensively on a wave of anti-Asian hate that followed the outbreak. But asking whether a virus first detected in Wuhan might have escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan was never inherently racist. It was an obvious question.Among the newly released files is a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory assessment dated May 27, 2020, about a month after President Donald Trump publicly raised the possibility of a Chinese lab-leak origin. The assessment reportedly found that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had the capabilities, materials, and research programs necessary for a laboratory-origin scenario.
The new Fauci files affirm the convictions of conspiracy theorists
A new trove of documents about COVID-19 supports what supposed conspiracy theorists have been saying for years.
Declassified files show U.S. intelligence assessed Wuhan lab as plausible COVID origin in May 2020, contradicting Fauci's public stance. Critics dismissed as conspiracy theorists proved justified; suppression of legitimate scientific debate via censorship and professional penalties reflects institutional governance failure.










