Think of it like letting the biggest shareholders at a company vote to redirect corporate revenue to their own pet projects. That’s essentially the concern Lefteris Karapetsas, founder of the Rotki portfolio tracker and longtime Ethereum developer, is raising about a new proposal floating through Ethereum’s research forums.

The proposal, titled “Validator Redirected Revenue” on ethresear.ch, would allow Ethereum validators to use consensus-layer voting power, weighted by the amount of ETH they stake, to redirect up to 10% of their rewards toward preselected smart contracts. Those contracts would theoretically fund public goods and infrastructure improvements. Karapetsas sees a different outcome entirely.

The cartel problem, explained

Here’s the thing about stake-weighted voting: whoever controls the most ETH gets the loudest voice. If a coalition of large validators holding 51% or more of staked ETH decides to coordinate, they could effectively dictate where redirected funds flow.

Karapetsas argues this creates a textbook cartel risk. A majority coalition wouldn’t just influence funding decisions. They could direct rewards back to themselves or their affiliates, turning a mechanism designed to support Ethereum’s development into a self-enrichment tool.